Schima Heinrich, Vollkron Michael, Boehm Herbert, Röthy Wilfried, Haisjackl Markus, Wieselthaler Georg, Wolner Ernst
Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and LBI of Cardio-Surgical Research, University of Vienna, Austria.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Jun;127(6):1743-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.09.029.
Weaning of patients from mechanical cardiac support after myocardial recovery has always involved multiple, interacting factors, particularly the training of the myocardium during reduction of pump flow. Rotary pumps offer training advantages when support flow is reduced, even to nearly zero. We report a computer analysis that evaluates the work required of the heart during partial unloading and removal of rotary pumps.
A computer model of the assisted circulation, previously implemented in MATLAB (The MathWorks Inc, Natick, Mass), has been augmented with a model of the MicroMed DeBakey ventricular assist device (MicroMed Technology, Inc, Houston, Tex). Flow, pressure patterns, and external work (pressure-volume area, calculated as the area of the ventricular pressure-volume loop [external work] plus potential energy) were calculated for nonassisted and various continuously assisted patients. Under low-flow conditions, the heart imposes an oscillating forward-backward flow through the non-occlusive rotary pump, causing an increase in ventricular work. Thus, an assist flow of 1 to 1.5 L/min requires work equivalent to that of the unsupported heart. At 60% contractility, the nonassisted pressure-volume area is 1.10 Ws/beat, and the potential energy is 0.38 Ws/beat. At a Qpump of 1 L/min, the pressure-volume area is 1.21 Ws/beat, and the potential energy is 0.37 Ws/beat. At a Qpump of 3 L/min, the pressure-volume area is 0.93 Ws/beat, and the potential energy is 0.29 Ws/beat. These conditions cannot be achieved with pulsatile systems.
During weaning and retraining, an implanted rotary pump can provide a workload to the heart like that in the nonassisted situation, thus increasing the predictability of weaning and reducing the risk of reiterating heart failure.
心肌恢复后患者脱离机械心脏支持一直涉及多个相互作用的因素,尤其是在泵流量降低期间对心肌的训练。当支持流量降低甚至接近零时,旋转泵具有训练优势。我们报告一项计算机分析,该分析评估了部分卸载和移除旋转泵期间心脏所需的功。
一个先前在MATLAB(MathWorks公司,马萨诸塞州纳蒂克)中实现的辅助循环计算机模型,已通过MicroMed DeBakey心室辅助装置(MicroMed Technology公司,得克萨斯州休斯顿)的模型进行了扩充。计算了非辅助和各种持续辅助患者的流量、压力模式以及外部功(压力-容积面积,计算为心室压力-容积环的面积[外部功]加上势能)。在低流量条件下,心脏通过非阻塞性旋转泵施加一个振荡的前后向血流,导致心室功增加。因此,1至1.5升/分钟的辅助流量所需的功与无支持心脏的功相当。在收缩性为60%时,非辅助压力-容积面积为1.10瓦秒/次搏动,势能为0.38瓦秒/次搏动。在泵流量为1升/分钟时,压力-容积面积为1.21瓦秒/次搏动,势能为0.37瓦秒/次搏动。在泵流量为3升/分钟时,压力-容积面积为0.93瓦秒/次搏动,势能为0.29瓦秒/次搏动。搏动系统无法实现这些条件。
在撤机和再训练期间,植入的旋转泵可为心脏提供与非辅助情况下类似的工作量,从而提高撤机的可预测性并降低再次发生心力衰竭的风险。