Ratcliff Roger, Perea Manuel, Colangelo Annette, Buchanan Lori
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1827 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):374-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.051.
Acquired aphasics and dyslexics with even very profound word reading impairments have been shown to perform relatively well on the lexical decision task, but direct contrasts with unimpaired participant's data is often complicated by extremely long reaction times for patient data. The dissociation between lexical decision and word naming performance shown by these patients is of theoretical importance, and here we present an analysis of processing underlying the lexical decision task. We are able to determine what aspects of performance are affected by acquired aphasics in the lexical decision task. We fit lexical decision data from aphasic patients and from normal readers with a sequential sampling model (the diffusion model) that simultaneously considers reaction time and accuracy. This model provides a powerful means of assessing processes involved in impaired and unimpaired lexical decision. Our results suggest that lexical decision may tap impairments at both a linguistic and a nonlinguistic level. These impairments combine to make patients produce the exaggerated lexical decision reaction times typical of neurolinguistic patients: we demonstrate that patients have compromised decision and nondecision processes but that the quality of the information upon which they base their decisions is not much different from that of unimpaired participants.
已证明,即使是单词阅读能力严重受损的后天性失语症患者和阅读障碍患者在词汇判断任务中表现相对较好,但由于患者数据的反应时间极长,与未受损参与者的数据进行直接对比往往很复杂。这些患者在词汇判断和单词命名表现之间的分离具有理论重要性,在此我们对词汇判断任务背后的加工过程进行分析。我们能够确定后天性失语症患者在词汇判断任务中哪些表现方面受到了影响。我们用一个同时考虑反应时间和准确性的序列抽样模型(扩散模型)来拟合失语症患者和正常阅读者的词汇判断数据。该模型为评估受损和未受损词汇判断中涉及的过程提供了一种有力手段。我们的结果表明,词汇判断可能在语言和非语言层面都存在损伤。这些损伤共同导致患者产生神经语言学患者典型的夸张的词汇判断反应时间:我们证明患者的决策和非决策过程受损,但他们做出决策所依据的信息质量与未受损参与者的并无太大差异。