Suppr超能文献

三级转诊中心贲门失弛缓症的管理复杂性:气囊扩张、赫勒肌切开术及肉毒杆菌毒素注射的应用

Complexities of managing achalasia at a tertiary referral center: use of pneumatic dilatation, Heller myotomy, and botulinum toxin injection.

作者信息

Vela Marcelo F, Richter Joel E, Wachsberger Don, Connor Jason, Rice Thomas W

机构信息

Center for Swallowing and Esophageal Disorders, Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1029-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30199.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to describe the results and complexity of treatment for achalasia patients presenting to a single esophagologist at a tertiary referral center and to make treatment recommendations based on this experience.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of achalasia patients treated between 1994 and 2002. Symptoms, manometric and timed barium esophagram results, and treatments/outcome at CCF determined.

RESULTS

232 patients (51% male, mean age = 53) were evaluated. Untreated patients (n = 184): Pneumatic dilatation (PD) used in 111 patients. Symptoms and barium emptying improved in 86% and 54%, respectively. Nineteen (17%) patients required subsequent Heller myotomy (HM). Perforation rate: 3/111 (2.7%) patients. 16% required proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) for GERD. HM was used in 72 patients (81% laparoscopic). Symptoms and barium emptying improved in 89% and 44%, respectively. PPI required in 53%. Botulinum toxin (Botox) was used in 39 older patients (mean age = 71); symptom improvement lasted for a mean 6.2 months, with frequent need for repeated injection (mean: 1.7, range: 1-7). About 43% required additional treatment with a different modality. Esophagectomy was done in three patients. Patients with prior surgery (n = 48): PD (n = 10) achieved symptom and barium emptying improvement in 67% and 11%, comparable to redo HM (n = 21) with 57% symptom improvement and 38% improved emptying. Esophagectomy required in eight patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful management of achalasia can be complex and may require more than one treatment modality. PD and HM are presently the best treatments for untreated achalasia with similar efficacy but greater PPI use after surgery. Both are less successful after prior HM.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述在一家三级转诊中心由一位食管病专家治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者的治疗结果及复杂性,并基于此经验提出治疗建议。

方法

对1994年至2002年间治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者进行回顾性病历审查。确定患者的症状、食管测压和定时钡餐食管造影结果以及在克利夫兰诊所的治疗/结局。

结果

共评估了232例患者(51%为男性,平均年龄 = 53岁)。未接受治疗的患者(n = 184):111例患者采用了气囊扩张术(PD)。症状和钡剂排空改善率分别为86%和54%。19例(17%)患者随后需要进行赫勒肌切开术(HM)。穿孔率:3/111(2.7%)例患者。16%的患者因胃食管反流病需要使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)。72例患者采用了HM(81%为腹腔镜手术)。症状和钡剂排空改善率分别为89%和44%。53%的患者需要使用PPI。39例老年患者(平均年龄 = 71岁)使用了肉毒杆菌毒素(肉毒素);症状改善平均持续6.2个月,且经常需要重复注射(平均:1.7次,范围:1 - 7次)。约43%的患者需要采用不同方式进行额外治疗。3例患者接受了食管切除术。接受过先前手术的患者(n = 48):10例接受PD治疗的患者症状和钡剂排空改善率分别为67%和11%,与21例接受再次HM治疗的患者相当,后者症状改善率为57%,排空改善率为38%。8例患者需要进行食管切除术。

结论

贲门失弛缓症的成功管理可能较为复杂,可能需要不止一种治疗方式。目前,PD和HM是未接受治疗的贲门失弛缓症的最佳治疗方法,疗效相似,但术后PPI使用更多。在先前接受HM治疗后,这两种方法的成功率均较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验