Pastor Aimee C, Mills Jessica, Marcon Margaret A, Himidan Sharifa, Kim Peter C W
Division of General Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jul;44(7):1349-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.117.
Treatment modalities for achalasia are evolving and remain controversial. Herein, we report the relative efficacy and outcomes after dilatation or myotomy in children with achalasia.
A retrospective analysis of all children treated for achalasia at a tertiary center from 1981 to 2007 was performed (n = 40). Demographics, presenting symptoms, perioperative parameters, and outcomes were analyzed using t tests and chi(2) statistics.
Thirty patients were initially treated by esophageal dilatation (ED), whereas 10 were treated by laparoscopic or open Heller myotomy (HM). Both groups were similar with respect to age (10.6 vs 12.4 years; P = .19). There were 18 males and 12 females in the ED group, compared to 5 males and 5 females in the HM group (P = .72). Mean duration of symptoms before diagnosis, including dysphagia, vomiting, food sticking, chest pain, and weight loss, was 15.9 months for ED and 10.7 months for HM (P = .41). Mean time from diagnosis to initial intervention was 76 days in ED vs 86 days in HM (P = .78). Subsequent interventions by myotomy or both dilatation and myotomy were required in 9 (30%) of 30 patients in the ED group and 2 (20%) of 10 patients in the HM group (P = .70). A clear transition from open to laparoscopic approach occurred between 1995 and 2001. Mean operating times were comparable (186.3 vs 156.0 minutes; P = .48). Of 14 laparoscopic myotomies, 11 (79%) had fundoplication, and 2 (18%) of the 11 were converted to open procedure. Intraoperative mucosal perforation rates were similar between open and laparoscopic groups (17% vs 18%). At follow-up, 32% of ED patients vs 43% HM had complete symptom relief (mean follow-up duration, 75.2 months; SD, 196.5).
Both dilatation and myotomy are effective immediate treatment of achalasia. A clear transition to and preference for laparoscopic approach has occurred in the treatment of achalasia in children.
贲门失弛缓症的治疗方式不断演变,且仍存在争议。在此,我们报告贲门失弛缓症患儿扩张术或肌切开术后的相对疗效及结果。
对1981年至2007年在一家三级中心接受贲门失弛缓症治疗的所有儿童进行回顾性分析(n = 40)。使用t检验和卡方统计分析人口统计学、出现的症状、围手术期参数及结果。
30例患者最初接受食管扩张术(ED)治疗,而10例接受腹腔镜或开放Heller肌切开术(HM)治疗。两组在年龄方面相似(10.6岁对12.4岁;P = 0.19)。ED组有18例男性和12例女性,HM组有5例男性和5例女性(P = 0.72)。诊断前症状的平均持续时间,包括吞咽困难、呕吐、食物黏附、胸痛和体重减轻,ED组为15.9个月,HM组为10.7个月(P = 0.41)。从诊断到首次干预的平均时间,ED组为76天,HM组为86天(P = 0.78)。ED组30例患者中有9例(30%)需要后续进行肌切开术或同时进行扩张术和肌切开术,HM组10例患者中有2例(20%)需要(P = 0.70)。1995年至2001年间出现了从开放手术到腹腔镜手术方式的明显转变。平均手术时间相当(186.3分钟对156.0分钟;P = 0.48)。在14例腹腔镜肌切开术中,11例(79%)进行了胃底折叠术,其中11例中有2例(18%)转为开放手术。开放组和腹腔镜组术中黏膜穿孔率相似(17%对18%)。随访时,ED组32%的患者与HM组43%的患者症状完全缓解(平均随访时间,75.2个月;标准差,196.5)。
扩张术和肌切开术都是贲门失弛缓症有效的即时治疗方法。在儿童贲门失弛缓症的治疗中已出现向腹腔镜手术方式的明显转变及偏好。