Suppr超能文献

人格障碍筛查:患者与知情者对人格障碍评估的比较

Screening for personality disorder: a comparison of personality disorder assessment by patient and informants.

作者信息

Walters Paul, Moran Paul, Choudhury Partha, Lee Tennyson, Mann Anthony

机构信息

Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(1):34-9. doi: 10.1002/mpr.162.

Abstract

The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II Version 2.0) is becoming the most favoured instrument to measure personality disorder but takes up to an hour to complete. The Standardized Assessment of Personality (SAP), an informant-based measure, takes 10 to 15 minutes to complete. Both instruments have been validated independently. This study aimed to determine whether the SAP is a suitable screening instrument for personality disorder as measured by the SCID-II. Fifty-seven psychiatric patients were assessed for personality disorder using both the SAP and the SCID-II. The SAP assessments were conducted blind to the results of the SCID-II assessments. Agreement between the two instruments in this population was low (kappa = 0.3). The level of agreement differed between personality disorder categories, ranging from kappa = 0.4 (antisocial) to 0.1 (narcissistic). In this population of patients, the SAP proved to be a poor screen for the SCID-II. The study highlights the discrepancy between informant and self-report assessments for personality disorder.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍结构化临床访谈(SCID-II第2.0版)正成为测量人格障碍最受青睐的工具,但完成该访谈需要长达一小时的时间。基于信息提供者的测量工具“人格标准化评估”(SAP)则需要10至15分钟来完成。这两种工具均已独立验证。本研究旨在确定SAP是否是一种适用于以SCID-II测量人格障碍的筛查工具。使用SAP和SCID-II对57名精神科患者进行了人格障碍评估。SAP评估在对SCID-II评估结果不知情的情况下进行。这两种工具在该人群中的一致性较低(kappa = 0.3)。不同人格障碍类别之间的一致性水平有所不同,范围从kappa = 0.4(反社会型)到0.1(自恋型)。在这群患者中,SAP被证明是SCID-II的一种较差的筛查工具。该研究凸显了人格障碍信息提供者评估与自我报告评估之间的差异。

相似文献

3
Results of the search for personality disorder screening tools: clinical implications.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;73(2):165-73. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07067.
7
Gender differences in personality disorders.
Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Apr;152(4):579-82. doi: 10.1176/ajp.152.4.579.
9
Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the semistructured Schedule Clinical Interview for personality disorders (SCID-II).
Psychiatriki. 2021 Dec 20;32(4):311-316. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.033. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
10
The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses.
J Pers Disord. 2000 Winter;14(4):291-9. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.4.291.

引用本文的文献

1
Informant assessment: The Informant Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory.
Psychol Assess. 2018 Jan;30(1):31-42. doi: 10.1037/pas0000487.
2
Self- and informant-reported perspectives on symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder.
Personal Disord. 2012 Apr;3(2):140-54. doi: 10.1037/a0026576. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
3
Screening for personality disorders.
J Pers Disord. 2007 Apr;21(2):179-98. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.179.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic impact of personality disorders in UK primary care attenders.
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;181:62-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.1.62.
2
Prevalence and correlates of personality disorders in a community sample.
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;180:536-42. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.6.536.
3
Personality pathology and treatment outcome in major depression: a review.
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;159(3):359-71. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.3.359.
4
Comparison of assessment of personality disorder by patients and informants.
Psychopathology. 2000 Sep-Oct;33(5):265-70. doi: 10.1159/000029156.
5
Rates of personality disorders in substance abusers: a comparison between DSM-III-R and DSM-IV.
J Pers Disord. 1999 Winter;13(4):375-84. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1999.13.4.375.
9
Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders. A meta-analysis.
Br J Psychiatry. 1997 Mar;170:205-28. doi: 10.1192/bjp.170.3.205.
10
Psychiatric and substance use comorbidity among treatment-seeking opioid abusers.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Jan;54(1):71-80. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830130077015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验