• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴II人格障碍结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)2.0版的评定者间信度和内部一致性

Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID-II), version 2.0.

作者信息

Maffei C, Fossati A, Agostoni I, Barraco A, Bagnato M, Deborah D, Namia C, Novella L, Petrachi M

机构信息

Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Department of Neuropsychiatric Sciences, University of Milan School of Medicine, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 1997 Fall;11(3):279-84. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.279.

DOI:10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.279
PMID:9348491
Abstract

Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the SCID-II 2.0 was assessed in a sample of 231 consecutively admitted in- and outpatients using a pairwise interview design, with randomized rater pairing and blind interview assessment. Interrater reliability coefficients ranged from .48 to .98 for categorical diagnosis (Cohen kappa), and from .90 to .98 for dimensional judgements (Intraclass correlation coefficient). Internal consistency coefficients were satisfactory (.71-.94). The results suggest that the SCID-II 2.0 has adequate interrater and internal consistency reliability.

摘要

采用配对访谈设计,对231名连续入院的门诊和住院患者样本进行了评估,以检验《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第二版(SCID-II)2.0的评分者间信度和内部一致性,评分者配对随机,访谈评估设盲。分类诊断(Cohen κ系数)的评分者间信度系数范围为0.48至0.98,维度判断(组内相关系数)的评分者间信度系数范围为0.90至0.98。内部一致性系数令人满意(0.71 - 0.94)。结果表明,SCID-II 2.0具有足够的评分者间信度和内部一致性信度。

相似文献

1
Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID-II), version 2.0.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴II人格障碍结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)2.0版的评定者间信度和内部一致性
J Pers Disord. 1997 Fall;11(3):279-84. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.279.
2
The interrater reliability of a Dutch version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders.荷兰版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》人格障碍结构化临床访谈的评分者间信度。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992 May;85(5):394-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb10326.x.
3
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
4
Short-interval test-retest interrater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II) in outpatients.门诊患者中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)人格障碍结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)的短间隔重测评分者间信度。
J Pers Disord. 1998 Summer;12(2):138-48. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1998.12.2.138.
5
Interrater reliability of Thai version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (T-SCID II).《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》轴II人格障碍结构化临床访谈泰语版(T-SCID II)的评分者间信度。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Feb;95(2):264-9.
6
The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses.协作性纵向人格障碍研究:轴I和轴II诊断的可靠性
J Pers Disord. 2000 Winter;14(4):291-9. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.4.291.
7
Twelve month test-retest reliability of a Japanese version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)人格障碍结构化临床访谈日语版的12个月重测信度。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003 Oct;57(5):532-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2003.01159.x.
8
Short-interval test-retest interrater reliability of the Dutch version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV personality disorders (SCID-II).《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)人格障碍结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)荷兰语版本的短间隔重测评分者间信度。
J Pers Disord. 2003 Dec;17(6):562-7. doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.6.562.25359.
9
Comparison of a diagnostic checklist with a structured interview for the assessment of DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders.用于评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)人格障碍的诊断清单与结构化访谈的比较。
Psychopathology. 1994;27(6):312-20. doi: 10.1159/000284889.
10
Attainment and maintenance of reliability of axis I and II disorders over the course of a longitudinal study.在一项纵向研究过程中轴I和轴II障碍的可靠性的获得与维持。
Compr Psychiatry. 2001 Sep-Oct;42(5):369-74. doi: 10.1053/comp.2001.24556.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening for borderline personality disorder (BPD) in malaysia: a validation study of the McLean screening instrument for BPD.马来西亚边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的筛查:麦克莱恩BPD筛查工具的验证研究
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2025 Aug 29;12(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40479-025-00309-z.
2
A controlled trial examining large Language model conformity in psychiatric assessment using the Asch paradigm.一项使用阿施范式检验大型语言模型在精神科评估中一致性的对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 12;25(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06912-2.
3
Mental Health and Personality Functioning of People With Probable Personality Disorder Who Have Coexisting Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
患有复杂性创伤后应激障碍的疑似人格障碍患者的心理健康和人格功能
Personal Ment Health. 2025 Feb;19(1):e70010. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70010.
4
A cluster analysis of attachment styles in patients with borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder and ADHD.边缘型人格障碍、双相情感障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍患者依恋风格的聚类分析。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2024 Oct 30;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40479-024-00271-2.
5
Aberrant brain dynamics in major depressive disorder during working memory task.重度抑郁症患者在工作记忆任务期间的异常脑动力学。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01854-4.
6
Evaluation of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents in routine clinical practice: a pre-post study.在常规临床实践中评估青少年辩证行为疗法:一项前后研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05876-z.
7
Age dependent effects of early intervention in borderline personality disorder in adolescents.青少年边缘型人格障碍早期干预的年龄依赖性效应。
Psychol Med. 2024 Jul;54(9):2033-2041. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724000126. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
8
Adults with a history of childhood maltreatment with and without mental disorders show alterations in the recognition of facial expressions.有童年期虐待史和无童年期虐待史的成年精神障碍患者对面部表情的识别存在改变。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2214388. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2214388.
9
Role of Personality and Psychiatric Disorders in the Perception of Pain.人格和精神障碍在疼痛感知中的作用。
Psychiatr Q. 2023 Jun;94(2):297-310. doi: 10.1007/s11126-023-10026-x. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
10
Alternation in functional connectivity within default mode network after psychodynamic psychotherapy in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍患者接受心理动力心理治疗后默认模式网络内功能连接性的改变
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2023 May 11;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12991-023-00449-y.