Mufson Laura, Dorta Kristen Pollack, Wickramaratne Priya, Nomura Yoko, Olfson Mark, Weissman Myrna M
Department of Clinical and Genetic Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, NY, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;61(6):577-84. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.6.577.
Adolescent depression is highly prevalent and has substantial morbidity, including suicide attempts, school dropout, and substance abuse, but many depressed adolescents are untreated. The school-based health clinic offers the potential for accessible and efficient treatment, although it is unknown whether school-based clinicians can be trained to implement evidence-based psychotherapies for depression in routine care.
To assess the effectiveness of interpersonal psychotherapy modified for depressed adolescents (IPT-A) compared with treatment as usual (TAU) in school-based mental health clinics.
A 16-week randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 1, 1999, through July 31, 2002.
Five school-based mental health clinics in New York City, NY. Patients Sixty-three adolescents referred for a mental health intake visit who met eligibility criteria. Eligible patients had a mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 18.6 (SD, 5.5) and a mean Children's Global Assessment Scale score of 52.6 (SD, 5.5) and met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder, dysthymia, depression disorder not otherwise specified, or adjustment disorder with depressed mood. Mean age was 15.1 years (SD, 1.9 years). The sample was predominantly female (n = 53 [84%]), Hispanic (n = 45 [71%]), and of low socioeconomic status. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive IPT-A (n = 34) or TAU (n = 29) from school-based health clinic clinicians.
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Children's Global Assessment Scale, Clinical Global Impressions scale, and the Social Adjustment Scale-Self-Report.
Adolescents treated with IPT-A compared with TAU showed greater symptom reduction and improvement in overall functioning. Analysis of covariance showed that compared with the TAU group, the IPT-A group showed significantly fewer clinician-reported depression symptoms on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (P =.04), significantly better functioning on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (P =.04), significantly better overall social functioning on the Social Adjustment Scale-Self-Report (P =.01), significantly greater clinical improvement (P =.03), and significantly greater decrease in clinical severity (P =.03) on the Clinical Global Impressions scale.
Interpersonal psychotherapy delivered in school-based health clinics is an effective therapy for adolescent depression. This effort is a significant step toward closing the gap between treatment conducted in the laboratory and community clinic.
青少年抑郁症非常普遍,且具有较高的发病率,包括自杀未遂、辍学和药物滥用等情况,但许多抑郁的青少年未得到治疗。校内健康诊所提供了便捷高效治疗的可能性,不过尚不清楚校内临床医生能否接受培训,以便在常规护理中实施基于证据的抑郁症心理治疗。
评估在校内心理健康诊所中,针对抑郁青少年改良的人际心理治疗(IPT - A)与常规治疗(TAU)相比的有效性。
1999年4月1日至2002年7月31日进行了一项为期16周的随机临床试验。
纽约市的五所校内心理健康诊所。
六十三名被转介进行心理健康初诊且符合入选标准的青少年。符合条件的患者汉密尔顿抑郁量表平均评分为18.6(标准差5.5),儿童总体评估量表平均评分为52.6(标准差5.5),并符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中重度抑郁症、恶劣心境、未另行说明的抑郁症或伴有抑郁情绪的适应障碍的标准。平均年龄为15.1岁(标准差1.9岁)。样本主要为女性(n = 53 [84%])、西班牙裔(n = 45 [71%]),且社会经济地位较低。
患者被随机分配接受来自校内健康诊所临床医生的IPT - A治疗(n = 34)或常规治疗(n = 29)。
汉密尔顿抑郁量表、贝克抑郁量表、儿童总体评估量表、临床总体印象量表和社会适应量表 - 自我报告。
与常规治疗相比,接受IPT - A治疗的青少年症状减轻更明显,整体功能改善更佳。协方差分析表明,与常规治疗组相比,IPT - A组在汉密尔顿抑郁量表上临床医生报告的抑郁症状显著更少(P = 0.04),在儿童总体评估量表上功能显著更好(P = 0.04),在社会适应量表 - 自我报告上整体社会功能显著更好(P = 0.01),在临床总体印象量表上临床改善显著更大(P = 0.03),临床严重程度下降显著更大(P = 0.03)。
在校内健康诊所提供的人际心理治疗是治疗青少年抑郁症的有效疗法。这一成果朝着缩小实验室治疗与社区诊所治疗之间的差距迈出了重要一步。