Jansman Frank G A, Postma Maarten J, van Hartskamp David, Willemse Pax H B, Brouwers Jacobus R B J
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Isala klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Clin Ther. 2004 Apr;26(4):579-89. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90060-4.
Capecitabine is an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil and has been studied for the treatment of colorectal cancer. In 2 Phase III trials, capecitabine was at least as effective as 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin and had a more favorable toxicity profile.
A cost-benefit analysis was used to assess the pharmacoeconomic profile of capecitabine compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, given according to the Mayo regimen, for colorectal cancer patients treated in the Netherlands.
The medical files of patients treated for colorectal cancer at a single center from 1999 to 2002 were examined to determine the numbers of outpatient visits for 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin administration, health care use and medication to manage adverse effects, and travel distance to and from the hospital. The costs of capecitabine treatment were simulated by assuming that the same patients were treated with capecitabine instead of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin. Toxicity data for capecitabine were derived from 2 Phase III studies that compared capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin.
The files of 65 patients were reviewed. Thirty-two patients received adjuvant treatment and 33 patients were treated palliatively for metastatic disease. The mean total costs of palliative treatment were Euro 4004 with capecitabine and Euro 5614 with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin. These results were robust in sensitivity analyses. The cost savings were primarily related to the number of outpatient visits for capecitabine versus the number of day-care treatment days for 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, despite the higher acquisition costs of capecitabine.
Based on this analysis, treatment of colorectal cancer with oral capecitabine is cost saving in the Netherlands compared with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin administered according to the Mayo regimen. Baseline savings were estimated at Euro 1610 for palliative treatment and Euro 934 for adjuvant treatment.
卡培他滨是5-氟尿嘧啶的口服前体药物,已被研究用于治疗结直肠癌。在两项III期试验中,卡培他滨的疗效至少与5-氟尿嘧啶加亚叶酸钙相当,且毒性特征更有利。
采用成本效益分析来评估在荷兰接受治疗的结直肠癌患者中,卡培他滨与按照梅奥方案给予的5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙相比的药物经济学概况。
检查了1999年至2002年在单一中心接受结直肠癌治疗的患者的医疗档案,以确定5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙给药的门诊就诊次数、医疗保健使用情况和用于管理不良反应的药物,以及往返医院的距离。通过假设相同患者接受卡培他滨而非5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙治疗来模拟卡培他滨治疗的成本。卡培他滨的毒性数据来自两项比较卡培他滨和5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙的III期研究。
审查了65例患者的档案。32例患者接受辅助治疗,33例患者因转移性疾病接受姑息治疗。卡培他滨姑息治疗的平均总成本为4004欧元,5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙为5614欧元。这些结果在敏感性分析中是稳健的。成本节约主要与卡培他滨的门诊就诊次数与5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙的日间护理治疗天数有关,尽管卡培他滨的购置成本较高。
基于该分析,在荷兰,与按照梅奥方案给予的5-氟尿嘧啶加亚叶酸钙相比,口服卡培他滨治疗结直肠癌可节省成本。姑息治疗的基线节省估计为1610欧元,辅助治疗为934欧元。