Bloem Lourens T, De Abreu Lourenço Richard, Chin Melvin, Ly Brett, Haas Marion
Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Block D, Building 5, 1 Quay St, Haymarket, NSW 2007 Australia.
Oncol Ther. 2016;4(1):103-116. doi: 10.1007/s40487-016-0020-4. Epub 2016 May 11.
To investigate the factors that affect the choice of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or its oral alternative, capecitabine, as first-line treatment in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
Patients treated with 5-FU or capecitabine for CRC between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013 in a teaching hospital in the Sydney metropolitan area, Australia were identified using the hospital's database MOSAIQ. The electronic medical record of each patient was manually reviewed to extract factors potentially affecting treatment choice. Logistic regression was used to assess which patient and/or treatment factors could explain the choice between 5-FU or capecitabine. Where it was available in the medical correspondence, the explicit reason for the choice made was extracted.
170 CRC patients were included; 119 on 5-FU, and 51 on capecitabine. The odds of receiving capecitabine as a first-line treatment were positively associated with giving patients a choice in the decision (OR = 17.51, 95% CI: 5.37-57.08). Qualitative data suggest treatment choices were motivated by convenience (oral administration) and tolerability. Time from diagnosis to treatment commencement (OR = 1.02 per month, 95% CI 1.00-1.04) was also found to be positively associated with the choice of capecitabine. The odds of being treated with capecitabine were lower for patients who lived further from the treating hospital (OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-0.94).
This study suggests that patient choice, favoring oral capecitabine over i.v. 5-FU, was a key factor influencing first-line treatment for CRC in this cohort. To respect their autonomy, patients should be involved in the clinical decision making process.
探讨影响选择5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)或其口服替代药物卡培他滨作为结直肠癌(CRC)患者一线治疗药物的因素。
利用澳大利亚悉尼都会区一家教学医院的数据库MOSAIQ,确定2011年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间在该医院接受5-FU或卡培他滨治疗CRC的患者。人工查阅每位患者的电子病历,以提取可能影响治疗选择的因素。采用逻辑回归分析评估哪些患者和/或治疗因素可以解释5-FU或卡培他滨之间的选择。从医疗通信中获取选择的明确理由并进行提取。
纳入170例CRC患者;119例接受5-FU治疗,51例接受卡培他滨治疗。接受卡培他滨作为一线治疗的几率与给予患者决策选择权呈正相关(比值比[OR]=17.51,95%置信区间[CI]:5.37-57.08)。定性数据表明,治疗选择的动机是便利性(口服给药)和耐受性。从诊断到开始治疗的时间(每月OR=1.02,95%CI 1.00-1.04)也与卡培他滨的选择呈正相关。居住地离治疗医院较远的患者接受卡培他滨治疗的几率较低(OR=0.22,95%CI 0.05-0.94)。
本研究表明,在本队列中,患者选择口服卡培他滨而非静脉注射5-FU是影响CRC一线治疗的关键因素。为尊重患者的自主权,应让患者参与临床决策过程。