Suppr超能文献

慢性呼吸衰竭急性加重期的治疗:负压通气与无创正压通气的联合应用

Treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic respiratory failure: integrated use of negative pressure ventilation and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.

作者信息

Todisco Tommaso, Baglioni Stefano, Eslami Amir, Scoscia Elvio, Todisco Cristina, Bruni Lucio, Dottorini Maurizio

机构信息

Pulmonary Division and Respiratory ICU, R. Silvestrini Hospital, Perugia.

出版信息

Chest. 2004 Jun;125(6):2217-23. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.6.2217.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) can be treated with either invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV), which can spare the complications of artificial airways. To evaluate the efficacy of an integrated approach using negative pressure ventilation (NPV) with iron lung and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV), we performed a prospective study in a group of patients admitted to our respiratory ICU (RICU) for ARF due to exacerbation of chronic respiratory failure (CRF).

SETTING

RICU at "R. Silvestrini" Hospital in Perugia, Italy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-two consecutive patients were included in the study and treated with iron lung as first choice or, when contraindicated or not tolerated, with NPPV using a nasal or facial mask. After 2 h of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV), the patients were reevaluated; in case of clinical deterioration, patients receiving NPV were switched to NPPV. When NPPV as a first or second line of treatment failed the patients were intubated.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

One hundred fifty-two patients received NIMV, 97 with iron lung as the first choice of treatment, and 55 with NPPV. Six patients treated with NPV were switched to NPPV during the first 2 h of treatment. Twenty-five patients required IMV. The success rate of the integrated use of NIMV (NPV plus NPPV) was 81.6%, compared to that of NPV (83.5%) and NPPV (70.5%). Twenty-one patients (13.8%) required tracheostomy; the duration of hospital stay was significantly lower in patients treated with NIMV only. Thirty patients required mechanical ventilation at home. Few severe complications were observed in patients receiving IMV.

CONCLUSIONS

The integrated use of two NIMV techniques is effective in patients with acute exacerbation of CRF. In most cases intubation and tracheostomy were avoided, thus reducing the complication rate of mechanical ventilation.

摘要

研究目的

急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)可采用有创机械通气(IMV)或无创机械通气(NIMV)进行治疗,后者可避免人工气道相关并发症。为评估负压通气(NPV)联合铁肺与无创正压通气(NPPV)的综合治疗方法的疗效,我们对一组因慢性呼吸衰竭(CRF)急性加重而入住我院呼吸重症监护病房(RICU)的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。

研究地点

意大利佩鲁贾“R. 西尔维斯特里尼”医院的RICU。

患者与方法

152例连续入选的患者纳入本研究,首选铁肺进行治疗,若有禁忌或不耐受,则使用鼻罩或面罩进行NPPV治疗。无创机械通气(NIMV)2小时后对患者进行重新评估;若临床症状恶化,接受NPV治疗的患者改为NPPV治疗。当NPPV作为一线或二线治疗失败时,对患者进行气管插管。

测量与结果

152例患者接受了NIMV治疗,其中97例首选铁肺治疗,55例首选NPPV治疗。6例接受NPV治疗的患者在治疗的前2小时内改为NPPV治疗。25例患者需要IMV治疗。NIMV(NPV加NPPV)综合使用的成功率为81.6%,NPV的成功率为83.5%,NPPV的成功率为70.5%。21例患者(13.8%)需要气管切开;仅接受NIMV治疗的患者住院时间明显缩短。30例患者需要在家中进行机械通气。接受IMV治疗的患者观察到的严重并发症较少。

结论

两种NIMV技术的综合使用对CRF急性加重患者有效。在大多数情况下避免了气管插管和气管切开,从而降低了机械通气的并发症发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验