• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术治疗颅外颈动脉分叉闭塞性疾病的早期结果。

Early results of carotid stent placement for treatment of extracranial carotid bifurcation occlusive disease.

作者信息

Powell Richard J, Schermerhorn Marc, Nolan Brian, Lenz James, Rzuidlo Eva, Fillinger Mark, Walsh Daniel, Wyers Mark, Zwolak Robert, Cronenwett Jack L

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jun;39(6):1193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.038.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.038
PMID:15192557
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to review the initial results of carotid artery angioplasty with stenting (CAS) performed by vascular surgeons to treat bifurcation occlusive disease. Most patients were selected for CAS if they had indications for endarterectomy (CEA) but were considered at high risk for surgery.

METHODS

Since December 2000, 74 carotid arteries in 69 patients underwent CAS, with distal balloon embolization protection in 96%. Mean patient age was 72 years; 82% of patients were men. Indications for CAS included asymptomatic disease (62%), transient ischemic attack (TIA; 23%), and cerebrovascular accident (15%). Mean internal carotid artery diameter stenosis was 82%. CAS was chosen over CEA because of cardiac (49%) or pulmonary (4%) comorbid conditions, hostile neck (25%), distal extent of disease (6%), and contralateral cranial nerve injury (1%). CAS was performed in 15% patients who were good surgical candidates, because of patient preference. Pathologic conditions were primary atherosclerosis (81%), recurrent carotid stenosis (18%), and dissection (1%). Procedures were transfemoral in 95% of cases and transcarotid in 5%. In 30% of cases the contralateral carotid artery had 80% or greater stenosis or was completely occluded.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 96% of cases. There were no deaths, no major strokes, one minor stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 3), and one TIA (neurologic event rate, 2.6%). The single minor stroke resolved completely by 1 month. One patient (1.3%) had a perioperative myocardial infarction. Transient neurologic changes occurred in 8% of patients during the protection balloon inflation, and all resolved with deflation. Bradyarrhythmia requiring pharmacologic treatment occurred in 14% of patients. At mean follow-up of 6 months there have been two instances of recurrent stenosis greater than 50% as noted at duplex scanning. During the same period, 266 carotid CEAs were performed, with a neurologic event rate of 0.8% (major stroke, 0.4%; no minor strokes; TIA, 0.4%) and a myocardial infarction rate of 3%. Combined stroke and death rate was 1.3% in patients who underwent CAS and 0.5% in patients who underwent CEA.

CONCLUSION

CAS with cerebral protection can be performed safely in patients at high surgical risk, with low perioperative morbidity and mortality. The durability of the procedure must be determined with longer follow-up.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾血管外科医生进行颈动脉血管成形术加支架置入术(CAS)治疗分叉处闭塞性疾病的初步结果。大多数有内膜切除术(CEA)指征但被认为手术风险高的患者被选来进行CAS。

方法

自2000年12月以来,69例患者的74条颈动脉接受了CAS,其中96%使用了远端球囊栓塞保护装置。患者平均年龄为72岁;82%为男性。CAS的指征包括无症状疾病(62%)、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA;23%)和脑血管意外(15%)。颈内动脉平均直径狭窄率为82%。由于心脏(49%)或肺部(4%)合并症、颈部解剖结构复杂(25%)、病变远端范围(6%)和对侧颅神经损伤(1%),选择CAS而非CEA。15%适合手术的患者因个人偏好接受了CAS。病理情况为原发性动脉粥样硬化(81%)、复发性颈动脉狭窄(18%)和夹层(1%)。95%的病例采用经股动脉途径,5%采用经颈动脉途径。30%的病例中,对侧颈动脉狭窄80%或更高或完全闭塞。

结果

96%的病例技术成功。无死亡病例,无重大卒中,1例轻度卒中(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分为3分),1例TIA(神经事件发生率为2.6%)。这例轻度卒中在1个月内完全恢复。1例患者(1.3%)发生围手术期心肌梗死。8%的患者在保护球囊充气时出现短暂性神经功能改变,球囊放气后均恢复。14%的患者发生需要药物治疗的缓慢性心律失常。平均随访6个月时,经双功超声扫描发现2例再狭窄大于50%。同期进行了266例颈动脉CEA,神经事件发生率为0.8%(重大卒中0.4%;无轻度卒中;TIA 0.4%);心肌梗死发生率为3%。接受CAS的患者中,卒中与死亡率合并为1.3%,接受CEA的患者中为0.5%。

结论

对于手术风险高的患者,采用脑保护的CAS可以安全进行,围手术期发病率和死亡率较低。该手术的耐久性必须通过更长时间的随访来确定。

相似文献

1
Early results of carotid stent placement for treatment of extracranial carotid bifurcation occlusive disease.颈动脉支架置入术治疗颅外颈动脉分叉闭塞性疾病的早期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jun;39(6):1193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.038.
2
Urgent carotid artery stenting with technical modifications for patients with transient ischemic attacks and minor stroke.对短暂性脑缺血发作和小卒中患者进行技术改良的紧急颈动脉支架置入术。
J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Oct;19(5):627-35. doi: 10.1583/JEVT-12-3852MR.1.
3
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients.颈动脉狭窄高危患者颈动脉支架置入术的结果:单神经血管中心 101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):448-53; discussion 453-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD.
4
A fifteen-year experience with carotid endarterectomy after a formal operative protocol requiring highly frequent patch angioplasty.一项为期15年的颈动脉内膜切除术经验,该手术遵循要求频繁进行补片血管成形术的正式手术方案。
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Apr;31(4):724-35. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.104591.
5
Carotid angioplasty and stenting, success relies on appropriate patient selection.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术,成功与否取决于合适的患者选择。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 May;47(5):946-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.049.
6
Transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal protection: experience in high-risk patients.采用血流逆转保护的经颈颈动脉支架置入术:高危患者的经验
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jul;46(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.070.
7
[Recent results of carotid stenting for treatment of extracranial carotid occlusive disease].
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Jun 1;45(11):759-62.
8
Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry.全球颈动脉支架注册研究的更新综述。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Oct;60(2):259-66. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10645.
9
Safety of latest-generation self-expanding stents in patients with NASCET-ineligible severe symptomatic extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.新一代自膨式支架在不符合北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术(NASCET)标准的重度症状性颅外颈内动脉狭窄患者中的安全性
Arch Neurol. 2004 Jan;61(1):39-43. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.1.39.
10
Outcome of carotid artery stenting for primary versus restenotic lesions.原发性病变与再狭窄病变的颈动脉支架置入术结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2009 Mar;33(3):586-96. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9862-8.