Suppr超能文献

婴儿反流性食管炎的诊断:食管远端组织学检查必须辅助上消化道内镜检查

[Diagnosis of reflux esophagitis in infants: histology of the distal esophagus must complement upper gastrointestinal endoscopy].

作者信息

Vieira Mário C, Pisani Julio C, Mulinari Rogério A

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

出版信息

J Pediatr (Rio J). 2004 May-Jun;80(3):197-202.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to validate the endoscopic findings against histologic features of the distal esophageal mucosa for the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis in infants.

METHODS

The data records of 167 patients (88 M; 79F) aged 38-364 days, referred for investigation of reflux esophagitis, between January 1995 and December 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. The association between nominal (presence or absence of esophagitis) and ordinal (grades of esophagitis) variables was analyzed through a correlation between the results of endoscopic findings and histology.

RESULTS

Endoscopy when compared with histologic analysis had a sensitivity of 45%; specificity of 71%; positive and negative predictive value of 89% and 21% respectively; and accuracy of 50%. Additionally, this study demonstrated that there was a poor correlation between endoscopic and histologic findings when endoscopy was normal or when endoscopic grade I esophagitis was observed (p = 0.10). Normal esophageal appearance failed to identify 79.2% of patients with histologic esophagitis. Conversely, amongst patients with endoscopic grade I esophagitis, 12.1% had normal histology.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that whilst endoscopy had a specificity of 71%, it did not attain an acceptable range of sensitivity (45%) to justify performing an endoscopy without biopsy, as many true cases of esophagitis would not be detected; and that the presence of grade I (non-erosive) esophagitis at endoscopy did not increase the value of the test in predicting histologic abnormality.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对照远端食管黏膜的组织学特征,验证内镜检查结果用于诊断婴儿反流性食管炎的准确性。

方法

回顾性分析1995年1月至2000年12月期间转诊来调查反流性食管炎的167例年龄在38 - 364天的患者(88例男性;79例女性)的数据记录。通过内镜检查结果与组织学结果之间的相关性,分析名义变量(食管炎的存在与否)和有序变量(食管炎的分级)之间的关联。

结果

与组织学分析相比,内镜检查的敏感性为45%;特异性为71%;阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为89%和21%;准确性为50%。此外,本研究表明,当内镜检查正常或观察到内镜下I级食管炎时,内镜检查结果与组织学结果之间的相关性较差(p = 0.10)。食管外观正常未能识别出79.2%的组织学诊断为食管炎的患者。相反,在内镜检查为I级食管炎的患者中,12.1%的患者组织学检查正常。

结论

我们得出结论,虽然内镜检查的特异性为71%,但其敏感性(45%)未达到可接受的范围,无法证明在不进行活检的情况下进行内镜检查是合理的,因为许多真正的食管炎病例将无法被检测到;并且内镜检查中I级(非糜烂性)食管炎 的存在并未增加该检查预测组织学异常的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验