Wang Dong, Zhang Yuan, Sun Dong-Xiao, Yu Ying, Xu Gui-Yun, Li Jun-Ying
Department of Animal Genetics & Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China.
Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2004 Mar;31(3):257-64.
The concept of heterosis has already been put forward for a century. The hypothesis of Dominance, Superdominace and Epistasis has also been brought forward to explain the phenomenon of heterosis. As we know, there is spatio-temporal speciality about the expression of gene and only expressed genes contribute to the formation of heterosis. So the study on heterosis in expression level becomes more meaningful. A lot of studies on heterosis in this level have been done in plants, but there is no such study carried on animals in this area. In this study, the technique of mRNA Reverse Transcription Differential Display was used to research the heterosis molecular mechanism of animal. In order to expound the molecular genetic mechanism of animals heterosis, the 4 x 4 completely diallele cross experiment of 4 purebreds chicken was conducted among White Polymouth Rock (EE), Chinese Silk Chicken (CC), CAU Brown (DD) and White Leghorn (AA). The chicken of 16 cross combinations were reared to 8 weeks old, then 30 chicken in each combination were selected randomly and slaughtered. The traits of body weight of 8 weeks, wing weight, eviscerated weight, eviscerated weight with giblet, breast muscle yield, leg muscle yield, body length, abdomen fat weight, intramuscular fat width, tibia length were measured, and in which 8 individuals in each combination were selected randomly to collect the liver tissue samples, which were stored in liquid nitrogen or at -80 degrees C to be used for total RNA (TRNA) extracting. After the total RNA (TRNA) was extracted, 16 TRNA pools were formed in the same quantitative according to the concentration of 8 individual TRNA. They were reversely transcribed with three anchor primers H-T11 A, H-T11 G and H-T11 C. Then the reverse transcription PCR for each transcript product was done in two repeats at the same time with the same anchor primers and 8 random primers. The polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of each PCR product was run in Bio-Rad Power 3,000 temperature control system. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained by AgNO3 according to the stain method described by Echt et al. The differential display bands in the polyacrylamide gel were counted. The band displayed is counted as 1 whereas no band is counted as 0 and only expression bands reproducible in two repeats were statistically analyzed. The correlation analysis between heterosis percentage and gene expression patterns was done with statistic analysis software (SAS) package. The statistic results indicated that among 690 total numbers of bands, the percentage of differential expression bands reproducible (457) is 66.23%. Eight kinds of gene differential expression patterns were found and listed as follow: 1): Band presents only in one purebred (P1);2): Band in one crossbred and its corresponding paternal purebred; or Band in one crossbred and its corresponding maternal purebred (P2);3): Band in purebreds and one crossbred (P3); 4): Band only in one crossbred (P4);5): Bands in both crossbreds and one purebred (P5);6): Bands only in both crossbreds (P6);7): Bands only in purebreds (P7);8): Bands both in purebreds and crossbreds P8. The differential expression of gene between purebred and crossbred chicken was detected for the first time. The proportion of each pattern in each kind of purebred combination is different. The percentage of P8 (75.34%) is the highest. The total percentage of differential expression patterns (24.66%) showed that the gene differential expression exists as a matter of fact. Among all the gene differential expression patterns, the percentage of P3 is the highest whereas the percentage of P7, P6 and P4 is very low, it indicated that different genes may have different expression patterns in purebreds and crossbreds. The results are similar to the study results on plants, which indicates that the gene differential expression between purebred and crossbred exists universally in biology. The correlation between gene expression patterns and heterosis percentage was studied, but correlation between P8 and the heterosis percentage is not significant (P > 0.05), it indicates that some patterns of gene differential expression may be the molecular genetic basic of heterosis. Among all the gene differential expression patterns, each pattern affects the expression of meat trait in different manner. There is significantly negative correlation between P4 and heterosis percentage of body weight of 8 weeks, breast muscle yield, leg muscle yield, eviscerated weight with giblet and eviscerated weight (P < 0.05); P1 is of significantly negative correlation with heterosis percentage of abdomen fat weight (P < 0.05) and of very significantly negative correlation with heterosis percentage of body length (P < 0.01); The negative correlation between P2 and heterosis percentage of intramuscular fat width is significant (P < 0.05); The positive correlation between P7 and heterosis percentage of leg muscle yield, wing weight, eviscerated weight with giblet and intramuscular fat width is significant (P < 0.05); The positive correlation between P5 and heterosis percentage of tibia length (P < 0.05) is significant. These results show that these 5 kinds of patterns play important role in heterosis forming of meat trait. P1 and P7 show that expressed gene in purebreds is depressed; P4 indicates that new gene expression occurs in crossbreds; P5 reveals that expressed gene only in one purebred express in all crossbreds. All genes of crossbreds come from purebred, which are not only the simple adding of these purebred genes, giving birth to unknown interaction between these genes coming from different purebreds, then leading to differential expression of genes. These gene differential expressions maybe form the heterosis of meat trait.
杂种优势的概念已经提出了一个世纪。显性假说、超显性假说和上位性假说也已被提出用以解释杂种优势现象。众所周知,基因的表达具有时空特异性,只有表达的基因才对杂种优势的形成有贡献。因此,从表达水平研究杂种优势变得更有意义。在植物方面已经开展了许多关于此水平杂种优势的研究,但在动物领域尚未有此类研究。在本研究中,采用mRNA逆转录差异显示技术来研究动物杂种优势的分子机制。为阐述动物杂种优势的分子遗传机制,选用白洛克鸡(EE)、中国丝羽乌骨鸡(CC)、农大褐鸡(DD)和白来航鸡(AA)4个纯系鸡进行4×4完全双列杂交试验。将16个杂交组合的鸡饲养至8周龄,然后从每个组合中随机选取30只鸡屠宰。测定8周龄体重、翅重、屠体重、全净膛重、胸肌率、腿肌率、体长、腹脂重、肌内脂肪宽度、胫长等性状,每个组合随机选取8只个体采集肝脏组织样本,样本保存于液氮或-80℃用于提取总RNA(tRNA)。提取总RNA(tRNA)后,根据8个个体tRNA的浓度等量混合形成16个tRNA池。用3种锚定引物H-T11A、H-T11G和H-T11C进行逆转录。然后,用相同的锚定引物和8种随机引物对每个转录产物同时进行2次重复的逆转录PCR。每个PCR产物在Bio-Rad Power 3000温度控制系统中进行聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳分离。电泳后,按照Echt等人描述的染色方法用AgNO3对凝胶进行染色。统计聚丙烯酰胺凝胶中的差异显示条带。有条带显示计为1,无条带计为0,仅对在2次重复中均可重复出现的表达条带进行统计分析。用统计分析软件(SAS)包对杂种优势率与基因表达模式进行相关性分析。统计结果表明,在总共690条带中,可重复的差异表达条带(457条)占66.23%。发现8种基因差异表达模式,具体如下:1)条带仅出现在一个纯系中(P1);2)条带出现在一个杂交组合及其相应父本纯系中;或条带出现在一个杂交组合及其相应母本纯系中(P2);3)条带出现在纯系和一个杂交组合中(P3);4)条带仅出现在一个杂交组合中(P4);5)条带出现在两个杂交组合和一个纯系中(P5);6)条带仅出现在两个杂交组合中(P6);7)条带仅出现在纯系中(P7);8)条带出现在纯系和杂交组合中(P8)。首次检测到纯系鸡和杂交鸡之间基因的差异表达。每种纯系组合中各模式的比例不同。P8的比例最高(75.34%)。差异表达模式的总比例(24.66%)表明基因差异表达确实存在。在所有基因差异表达模式中,P3的比例最高,而P7、P6和P4的比例很低,这表明不同基因在纯系和杂交系中可能具有不同的表达模式。结果与植物的研究结果相似,表明纯系和杂交系之间的基因差异表达在生物学中普遍存在。研究了基因表达模式与杂种优势率之间的相关性,但P8与杂种优势率之间的相关性不显著(P>0.05),这表明某些基因差异表达模式可能是杂种优势的分子遗传基础。在所有基因差异表达模式中;每种模式以不同方式影响肉用性状的表达。P4与8周龄体重、胸肌率、腿肌率、全净膛重和屠体重的杂种优势率呈显著负相关(P<0.05);P1与腹脂重的杂种优势率呈显著负相关(P<0.05),与体长的杂种优势率呈极显著负相关(P<0.01);P2与肌内脂肪宽度的杂种优势率呈显著负相关(P<0.05);P7与腿肌率、翅重、全净膛重和肌内脂肪宽度的杂种优势率呈显著正相关(P<0.05);P5与胫长的杂种优势率呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。这些结果表明这5种模式在肉用性状杂种优势形成中起重要作用。P1和P7表明纯系中表达的基因受到抑制;P4表明杂交系中出现新的基因表达;P5表明仅在一个纯系中表达的基因在所有杂交系中均表达。杂交系的所有基因均来自纯系,并非这些纯系基因的简单相加,不同纯系来源的基因之间产生了未知的相互作用,进而导致基因的差异表达。这些基因差异表达可能形成肉用性状的杂种优势。