Wilson I G, Fell D, Robinson S L, Smith G
University Department of Anaesthesia, Leicester Royal Infirmary.
Anaesthesia. 1992 Apr;47(4):300-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02168.x.
We have compared, in 40 healthy patients, the cardiovascular responses induced by laryngoscopy and intubation with those produced by insertion of a laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone and maintained with enflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen; vecuronium was used for muscle relaxation. Arterial pressure was measured with a Finapres monitor. The mean maximum increase in systolic arterial pressure after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation was 51.3% compared with 22.9% for laryngeal mask insertion (p less than 0.01). Increases in maximum heart rate were similar, (26.6% v 25.7%) although heart rate remained elevated for longer after tracheal intubation. We conclude that insertion of the laryngeal mask airway is accompanied by smaller cardiovascular responses than those after laryngoscopy and intubation and that its use may be indicated in those patients in whom a marked pressor response would be deleterious.
我们对40例健康患者进行了比较,观察喉镜检查及气管插管与喉罩置入所引起的心血管反应。采用硫喷妥钠诱导麻醉,并用恩氟烷和氧化亚氮-氧气维持麻醉;使用维库溴铵进行肌肉松弛。用Finapres监测仪测量动脉压。喉镜检查及气管插管后收缩压的平均最大增幅为51.3%,而喉罩置入后为22.9%(P<0.01)。最大心率的增幅相似(分别为26.6%和25.7%),不过气管插管后心率保持升高的时间更长。我们得出结论,喉罩气道置入所伴随的心血管反应比喉镜检查及气管插管后要小,对于那些出现明显升压反应会有害的患者,可能适合使用喉罩气道。