Vaithialingam Balaji, Bhadrinarayan Varadarajan, Rudrappa Satish
Department of Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care, International Institute of Neurosciences, Aster Whitefield Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Department of Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jul-Sep;41(3):410-417. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_317_24. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) have a great application as an alternative to tracheal intubation, prompting a paradigm shift in routine anesthetic practice. However, its usage in neuroanesthesia is limited and debatable, considering the clinical challenges and complexity of neurosurgical procedures. Even though literature evidence exits regarding successful airway management with SADs in neurosurgery, there is no clear-cut evidence or consensus among anesthesiologists. Articles were searched in PubMed and Google Scholar by using the keywords "Supraglottic airway" AND "Laryngeal Mask" OR "LMA" AND "Craniotomy" over the past 30 years. In addition, a manual search was performed (with additional keywords "neurosurgery," spine surgery," "I-gel," "ILMA," "awake craniotomy," "radiology," "electroconvulsive therapy," and "magnetic resonance imaging") to retrieve additional articles. The primary goal of this narrative review is to determine the applicability of SADs in various neurosurgical settings. According to the review, SADs play an important role as a rescue device during intraoperative emergencies such as accidental tracheal extubation (supine, lateral, and prone positions with head fixed on cranial pins), sudden airway loss due to seizure during awake craniotomy, postoperative airway loss following trans-nasal pituitary surgeries, and macroglossia. SADs can be used successfully for short-duration minimally invasive elective procedures such as cranioplasty, burr hole evacuation of subdural collection, battery implantation for deep brain stimulation, vario-guided biopsies, and minimally invasive spine surgeries. Furthermore, SADs serve a significant function in blunting extubation responses, thereby preventing cerebral edema and tumor bed hemorrhage. Only a few studies have supported the use of SADs in long-duration major intracranial tumour surgeries, making its use controversial in major surgeries where intracranial pressure control is the key. The SADs also have clinical utility in various non-operating room neuroanesthesia procedures.
声门上气道装置(SADs)作为气管插管的替代方法有广泛应用,促使常规麻醉实践发生了范式转变。然而,考虑到神经外科手术的临床挑战和复杂性,其在神经麻醉中的应用有限且存在争议。尽管有文献证据表明在神经外科手术中使用SADs可成功进行气道管理,但麻醉医生之间尚无明确的证据或共识。在过去30年中,通过在PubMed和谷歌学术中使用关键词“声门上气道”和“喉罩”或“LMA”以及“开颅手术”进行文献检索。此外,还进行了手动检索(使用额外的关键词“神经外科手术”、“脊柱手术”、“I-gel”、“ILMA”、“清醒开颅手术”、“放射学”、“电惊厥治疗”和“磁共振成像”)以获取更多文章。本叙述性综述的主要目的是确定SADs在各种神经外科手术场景中的适用性。根据综述,SADs在术中紧急情况如意外气管拔管(仰卧位、侧卧位和俯卧位,头部固定在颅骨针上)、清醒开颅手术期间因癫痫发作导致的突然气道丧失、经鼻垂体手术后的术后气道丧失以及巨舌症等情况下作为救援装置发挥重要作用。SADs可成功用于短时间的微创择期手术,如颅骨成形术、硬膜下血肿钻孔引流、深部脑刺激电池植入、各种引导活检以及微创脊柱手术。此外,SADs在减轻拔管反应方面发挥重要作用,从而预防脑水肿和肿瘤床出血。只有少数研究支持在长时间的大型颅内肿瘤手术中使用SADs,这使得其在以控制颅内压为关键的大型手术中的应用存在争议。SADs在各种非手术室神经麻醉程序中也具有临床实用性。