Meshack A F, Hu S, Pallonen U E, McAlister A L, Gottlieb N, Huang P
Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Health Educ Res. 2004 Dec;19(6):657-68. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg088. Epub 2004 Jun 15.
The study was designed to examine how intensity of anti-smoking media campaigns and differing types of anti-smoking community-based programs influence young adolescents' tobacco use and related psychosocial variables. Sixth grade students attending 11 middle schools in eight study communities assigned to varying intervention conditions were assessed by a pre-intervention survey conducted in spring 2000. The assessment was followed by summer and fall 2000 media and community interventions that were evaluated by post-intervention data collection taking place with a new cohort of sixth graders in the same 11 schools in late fall 2000. In analyses conducted at the school level, the enhanced school and comprehensive community program conditions outperformed the no intervention program condition to reduce tobacco use and intentions to use tobacco. Combining the intensive or low media campaign with the comprehensive community program was most effective in suppressing positive attitudes toward smoking, while the enhanced school program alone was less effective in influencing attitudes. The most consistent changes, at least short-term, to reduce teen tobacco use, susceptibility to smoking and pro-smoking attitudes were achieved by combining the intensive media campaign with the comprehensive community program condition.
该研究旨在考察反吸烟媒体宣传活动的强度以及不同类型的社区反吸烟项目如何影响青少年的烟草使用及相关的社会心理变量。2000年春季,对分配到不同干预条件下的八个研究社区中11所中学的六年级学生进行了干预前调查评估。随后在2000年夏季和秋季开展了媒体和社区干预,并通过在2000年深秋对同一11所学校新一批六年级学生进行干预后数据收集来对这些干预进行评估。在学校层面进行的分析中,强化学校和综合社区项目条件在减少烟草使用和吸烟意愿方面优于无干预项目条件。将高强度或低强度媒体宣传活动与综合社区项目相结合,在抑制对吸烟的积极态度方面最为有效,而仅强化学校项目在影响态度方面效果较差。通过将高强度媒体宣传活动与综合社区项目条件相结合,在减少青少年烟草使用、吸烟易感性和支持吸烟态度方面至少在短期内实现了最一致的变化。