Bickel Warren K, Giordano Louis A, Badger Gary J
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, USA.
Addiction. 2004 Jul;99(7):855-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00733.x.
The behavioral process of risk-sensitive foraging (RSF) specifies that the level of satiation or deprivation determines choice between a constant and variable quantity of food. Specifically, RSF stipulates that organisms experiencing satiation and deprivation prefer constant (risk-averse) and variable (risk-prone) choices, respectively. The relevance of this behavioral process to risky choices of opioid-dependent patients is examined in this study.
Thirty adult opioid-dependent out-patients made hypothetical choices between constant and variable heroin sources with equivalent means. Preferences for constant (e.g. three bags of heroin) and variable heroin sources (e.g. on average produces three bags of heroin, but vary from one to five bags of heroin on any instance) were assessed using questionnaires that manipulated the amount, delay to receipt and drug potency of heroin across approximately 20 levels. Subjects made choices between constant and variable options after hearing scripts describing the signs and symptoms of opioid satiation and opioid deprivation.
Consistent with the prediction of RSF, subjects purchased significantly more hypothetical heroin from a variable source when exposed to an opioid-deprived script than an opioid-satiated script. This pattern was observed across manipulations of heroin amount, delay to receipt of heroin and heroin potency. Selection of the variable option increased as a function of magnitude under the deprived conditions. The selection of the variable option generally did not increase as a function of magnitude under the satiated conditions except when delay to heroin delivery increased. As delay increased, selection of the variable option increased under the satiated script, but at a lower level observed with the deprived script.
These data suggest that risky choices of heroin-dependent individuals can be understood and predicted with the application of RSF theory. This research suggests that an evolutionarily old behavioral process may contribute to the risky behavior of the drug-dependent.
风险敏感觅食(RSF)的行为过程表明,饱腹感或饥饿程度决定了在固定量和变量食物之间的选择。具体而言,RSF规定,经历饱腹感和饥饿感的生物体分别偏好固定(风险规避)和可变(风险倾向)选择。本研究探讨了这一行为过程与阿片类药物依赖患者风险选择的相关性。
30名成年阿片类药物依赖门诊患者在具有同等均值的固定和可变海洛因来源之间做出假设选择。使用问卷评估对固定(例如三包海洛因)和可变海洛因来源(例如平均产生三包海洛因,但在任何情况下从一包到五包海洛因不等)的偏好,问卷在大约20个水平上操纵了海洛因的数量、接收延迟和药物效力。在听取描述阿片类药物饱腹感和阿片类药物戒断的体征和症状的脚本后,受试者在固定和可变选项之间做出选择。
与RSF的预测一致,当暴露于阿片类药物戒断脚本时,受试者从可变来源购买的假设海洛因比阿片类药物饱腹脚本时显著更多。在海洛因数量、海洛因接收延迟和海洛因效力的操纵中均观察到这种模式。在戒断条件下,可变选项的选择随着量的增加而增加。在饱腹条件下,可变选项的选择通常不会随着量的增加而增加,除非海洛因递送延迟增加。随着延迟增加,在饱腹脚本下可变选项的选择增加,但低于在戒断脚本下观察到的水平。
这些数据表明,应用RSF理论可以理解和预测海洛因依赖个体的风险选择。这项研究表明,一个进化上古老的行为过程可能导致药物依赖者的风险行为。