Williams Dudley H, O'Brien Dominic P, Sandercock Alan M, Stephens Elaine
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
J Mol Biol. 2004 Jul 2;340(2):373-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.056.
Recent hydrogen-deuterium exchange experiments have highlighted tightening and loosening of protein structures upon ligand binding, with changes in bonding (DeltaH) and order (DeltaS) which contribute to the overall thermodynamics of ligand binding. Tightening and loosening show that ligand binding respectively stabilises or destabilises the internal structure of the protein, i.e. it shows positive or negative cooperativity between ligand binding and the receptor structure. In the case of membrane-bound receptors, such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and ligand gated ion channel receptors (LGICRs), most binding studies have focussed on association/dissociation constants. Where these have been broken down into enthalpic and entropic contributions, the phenomenon of "thermodynamic discrimination" between antagonists and agonists has often been noted; e.g. for a receptor where agonist binding is predominantly enthalpy driven, antagonist binding is predominantly entropy driven and vice versa. These data have not previously been considered in terms of the tightening, or loosening, of receptor structures that respectively occurs upon positively, or negatively, cooperative binding of ligand. Nor have they been considered in light of the homo- and hetero-oligomerisation of GPCRs and the possibility of ligand-induced changes in oligomerisation. Here, we argue that analysis of the DeltaH and DeltaS of ligand binding may give useful information on ligand-induced changes in membrane-bound receptor oligomers, relevant to the differing effects of agonists and antagonists.
最近的氢-氘交换实验突出了配体结合时蛋白质结构的收紧和松弛,以及键合(ΔH)和有序性(ΔS)的变化,这些变化有助于配体结合的整体热力学。收紧和松弛表明配体结合分别稳定或破坏了蛋白质的内部结构,即它显示了配体结合与受体结构之间的正或负协同性。对于膜结合受体,如G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)和配体门控离子通道受体(LGICR),大多数结合研究都集中在缔合/解离常数上。当这些常数被分解为焓和熵的贡献时,常常会注意到拮抗剂和激动剂之间的“热力学区分”现象;例如,对于一个激动剂结合主要由焓驱动的受体,拮抗剂结合主要由熵驱动,反之亦然。以前尚未从配体正协同或负协同结合时分别发生的受体结构收紧或松弛的角度来考虑这些数据。也没有根据GPCR的同型和异型寡聚化以及配体诱导的寡聚化变化的可能性来考虑这些数据。在这里,我们认为分析配体结合的ΔH和ΔS可能会提供有关配体诱导的膜结合受体寡聚体变化的有用信息,这与激动剂和拮抗剂的不同作用相关。