• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ofloxacin vs tobramycin for the treatment of external ocular infection. Ofloxacin Study Group II.

作者信息

Gwon A

机构信息

Allergan Pharmaceuticals, Irvine, Calif. 92713-9534.

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 1992 Sep;110(9):1234-7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080210052022.

DOI:10.1001/archopht.1992.01080210052022
PMID:1520109
Abstract

A multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical investigation was conducted comparing 0.3% ofloxacin and 0.3% tobramycin for topical treatment of external ocular infection. One drop (1.35 micrograms) of either test solution was instilled six times daily for 2 days and thereafter four times daily for the next 8 days. At the day 3 to 5 follow-up examination, the severity of signs and symptoms based on a clinical summary score of 10 key variables was reduced from baseline values significantly (P less than .05) more with ofloxacin (-6.4 +/- 4.37; mean +/- SD) than with tobramycin (-4.78 +/- 3.13); by day 11, the difference between the groups was no longer significant. At days 3 to 5 and day 11 examinations, clinical, microbiologic, and overall improvement rates were similar, with no significant differences seen between the groups. Ofloxacin was found as effective, safe, and comfortable as tobramycin in patients with external ocular infection and may provide earlier symptom relief.

摘要

相似文献

1
Ofloxacin vs tobramycin for the treatment of external ocular infection. Ofloxacin Study Group II.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1992 Sep;110(9):1234-7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080210052022.
2
Twice-a-day versus four-times-a-day ofloxacin treatment of external ocular infection.
CLAO J. 1998 Jan;24(1):48-51.
3
Efficacy of ofloxacin vs cefazolin and tobramycin in the therapy for bacterial keratitis. Report from the Bacterial Keratitis Study Research Group.氧氟沙星与头孢唑林和妥布霉素治疗细菌性角膜炎的疗效比较。细菌性角膜炎研究小组报告。 (注:原文中“of ofloxacin”多了一个of)
Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Oct;113(10):1257-65. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100100045026.
4
Evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety of tobramycin/dexamethasone ophthalmic suspension 0.3%/0.05% compared to azithromycin ophthalmic solution 1% in the treatment of moderate to severe acute blepharitis/blepharoconjunctivitis.比较妥布霉素/地塞米松 0.3%/0.05%眼用混悬液与阿奇霉素 1%眼用溶液治疗中重度急性睑缘炎/睑结膜炎的临床疗效和安全性评价。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jan;27(1):171-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.539603. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
5
Topical lomefloxacin 0.3% twice daily versus tobramycin 0.3% in acute bacterial conjunctivitis: A multicenter double-blind phase III study.0.3%洛美沙星滴眼液每日两次与0.3%妥布霉素滴眼液治疗急性细菌性结膜炎的多中心双盲III期研究。
Ophthalmologica. 1999;213(4):250-7. doi: 10.1159/000027430.
6
A phase III clinical trial of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution versus 0.3% ofloxacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.一项比较0.5%左氧氟沙星滴眼液与0.3%氧氟沙星滴眼液治疗细菌性结膜炎的III期临床试验。
Ophthalmology. 2003 Mar;110(3):457-65. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01894-8.
7
Safety and efficacy of topical norfloxacin versus tobramycin in the treatment of external ocular infections.局部应用诺氟沙星与妥布霉素治疗眼部外感染的安全性和有效性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Dec;32(12):1820-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.12.1820.
8
Perioperative ofloxacin vs. tobramycin: efficacy in external ocular adnexal sterilization and anterior chamber penetration.围手术期氧氟沙星与妥布霉素对比:对外眼附属器消毒及前房穿透的疗效
Can J Ophthalmol. 1995 Feb;30(1):11-20.
9
Comparison of topical 0.3% ofloxacin to fortified tobramycin-cefazolin in the therapy of bacterial keratitis.局部应用0.3%氧氟沙星与强化妥布霉素-头孢唑林治疗细菌性角膜炎的比较。
Infection. 2000 May-Jun;28(3):149-52. doi: 10.1007/s150100050068.
10
Comparison of topical 0.3% ofloxacin with fortified tobramycin plus cefazolin in the treatment of bacterial keratitis.0.3%氧氟沙星局部用药与强化妥布霉素加头孢唑林治疗细菌性角膜炎的比较。
Eye (Lond). 1999 Dec;13 ( Pt 6):744-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.1999.220.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for chronic blepharitis.慢性睑缘炎的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD005556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005556.pub2.
2
Bacterial conjunctivitis.细菌性结膜炎
Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec 6;4:1451-7. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S10162.
3
Safety and tolerability of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis: data from six clinical and phase I safety studies.贝西沙星滴眼液 0.6%治疗细菌性结膜炎的安全性和耐受性:来自六项临床和 I 期安全性研究的数据。
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(10):675-85. doi: 10.2165/11536720-000000000-00000.
4
Acute infectious conjunctivitis in childhood.儿童急性感染性结膜炎
Paediatr Child Health. 2001 Jul;6(6):329-35. doi: 10.1093/pch/6.6.329.
5
3-day treatment with azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus 7-day treatment with tobramycin 0.3% for purulent bacterial conjunctivitis: multicentre, randomised and controlled trial in adults and children.1.5%阿奇霉素滴眼液3天疗法与0.3%妥布霉素7天疗法治疗脓性细菌性结膜炎:成人及儿童多中心随机对照试验
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;91(4):465-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.103556. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
6
Delivery of antibiotics to the eye using a positively charged polysaccharide as vehicle.使用带正电荷的多糖作为载体将抗生素递送至眼部。
AAPS PharmSci. 2001;3(4):E34. doi: 10.1208/ps030434.
7
Treatment of ocular infections with topical antibacterials.局部应用抗菌药物治疗眼部感染。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999 Nov;37(5):351-60. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199937050-00001.
8
Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of bacterial keratitis.细菌性角膜炎治疗中的药代动力学考量
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994 Aug;27(2):129-49. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199427020-00005.