McAllister Marc, Bhayani Sam B, Ong Albert, Jaffe William, Malkowicz S Bruce, VanArsdalen Keith, Chow George K, Jarrett Thomas W
Brady Urologic Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-8915, USA.
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):183-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132143.33340.51.
Major vascular injuries are uncommon but serious complications of laparoscopic surgery. Early recognition and conversion to an open procedure may be required to avoid further complications. We report 2 cases in which the vena cava was transected during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy, and review the literature.
All urological laparoscopic cases from 1993 to 2002 at 2 institutions were reviewed to identify major vessel transection. Two cases of inadvertent transection of the vena cava were identified. Medical records were reviewed for clinical and pathological information to identify factors leading to this complication. A MEDLINE search was performed to identify similar reports in the literature.
Two patients at 2 institutions were identified with vena caval transection during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy. In both cases the vena cava was misidentified as a renal vein. The injury was recognized immediately in both cases and an open repair was performed by vascular surgery. Both patients recovered with no sequelae. In both cases a rotated camera on an angled laparoscope in addition to the relative lack of retroperitoneal landmarks may have contributed to a loss of orientation within the operative field. A similar report of an aortic transection was also found in the literature.
Disorientation of the operating surgeon within the surgical field secondary to rotation of the camera lens and lack of retroperitoneal landmarks may contribute to vena caval transection during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy. This injury has not been found in transperitoneal nephrectomy, likely because more intra-abdominal landmarks exist, aiding in maintenance of orientation. Prompt intraoperative recognition and repair of the transection results in a favorable outcome.
严重血管损伤是腹腔镜手术中少见但严重的并发症。可能需要早期识别并转为开放手术以避免进一步并发症。我们报告2例在腹膜后腹腔镜肾切除术中腔静脉被横断的病例,并复习相关文献。
回顾1993年至2002年在2家机构进行的所有泌尿外科腹腔镜手术病例,以确定主要血管横断情况。发现2例腔静脉意外横断病例。查阅病历以获取临床和病理信息,确定导致该并发症的因素。进行MEDLINE检索以查找文献中类似的报告。
在2家机构的2例患者在腹膜后腹腔镜肾切除术中发生腔静脉横断。2例中腔静脉均被误认作肾静脉。2例均立即识别出损伤,由血管外科进行开放修复。2例患者均康复且无后遗症。2例中除了相对缺乏腹膜后标志外,角度腹腔镜上的旋转摄像头可能导致术野内方向迷失。文献中还发现1例主动脉横断的类似报告。
由于摄像头镜头旋转及缺乏腹膜后标志导致术者在手术视野中方向迷失,可能是腹膜后腹腔镜肾切除术中腔静脉横断的原因。经腹肾切除术中未发现这种损伤,可能是因为存在更多的腹腔内标志有助于维持方向。术中及时识别并修复横断可取得良好预后。