Suppr超能文献

车辆不匹配:损伤模式与严重程度

Vehicle mismatch: injury patterns and severity.

作者信息

Acierno S, Kaufman R, Rivara F P, Grossman D C, Mock C

机构信息

Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, H-220 Health Sciences Center, University of Washington, P.O. Box 359960, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-1520, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2004 Sep;36(5):761-72. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2003.07.001.

Abstract

Light truck vehicles (LTV) are becoming more popular on US highways. This creates greater opportunity for collisions with passenger vehicles (PV). The mismatch in weight, stiffness, and height between LTV and PV has been surmised to result in increased fatalities among PV occupants when their vehicles collide with LTV. We reviewed cases of vehicle mismatch collisions in the Seattle Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) database to establish patterns and source of injury. Of the first 200 Seattle CIREN cases reviewed, 32 collisions with 41 occupant cases were found to involve LTV versus PV. The cases were reviewed by type of collision and vehicle of injured occupant: side impact of PV with LTV, front impact of PV with LTV, and front impact of LTV with PV. For each type of crash, injury patterns and mechanisms were identified. For side impact to PV, head and upper thorax injuries were frequently encountered due to LTV bumper frame contact above the PV side door reinforcement. For frontal impact to PV, severe multiple extremity fractures along with some head and chest injuries were caused by intrusion of the instrument panel and steering column due to bumper frame override of the LTV. Underriding of the PV when colliding with the LTV resulted in severe lower extremity fractures of the LTV occupant due to intrusion of the toe pan into the vehicle compartment of the LTV. The injuries and the sources identified in this case series support the need for re-designing both LTV and PV to improve vehicle compatibility. Revising Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 214 to reinforce the entire door, consider adding side airbags, and re-engineering LTV bumpers and/or frame heights and PV front ends are possible ways to reduce these injuries and deaths by making the vehicles more compatible.

摘要

轻型卡车(LTV)在美国高速公路上越来越常见。这增加了与乘用车(PV)发生碰撞的可能性。人们推测,LTV与PV在重量、刚度和高度上的不匹配,会导致PV乘客在车辆与LTV碰撞时死亡人数增加。我们回顾了西雅图碰撞损伤研究与工程网络(CIREN)数据库中的车辆不匹配碰撞案例,以确定损伤模式和损伤来源。在回顾的西雅图CIREN的前200个案例中,发现32起碰撞涉及41名乘客案例,是LTV与PV之间的碰撞。这些案例按碰撞类型和受伤乘客所乘车辆进行了回顾:PV与LTV的侧面碰撞、PV与LTV的正面碰撞以及LTV与PV的正面碰撞。对于每种碰撞类型,确定了损伤模式和机制。对于PV的侧面碰撞,由于LTV保险杠框架接触到PV侧门加强件上方,经常会出现头部和上胸部受伤。对于PV的正面碰撞,由于LTV保险杠框架越过PV,仪表板和转向柱侵入,导致严重的多肢骨折以及一些头部和胸部受伤。PV与LTV碰撞时从下方钻入,导致LTV乘客的脚趾板侵入LTV车厢,从而造成严重的下肢骨折。本案例系列中确定的损伤和损伤来源表明,需要重新设计LTV和PV,以提高车辆兼容性。修订联邦机动车安全标准214,加强整个车门,考虑增加侧面安全气囊,以及重新设计LTV保险杠和/或车架高度以及PV前端,是使车辆更兼容从而减少这些伤亡的可能方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验