Morgan D G, Stewart N J, D'arcy K C, Werezak L J
Institute of Agricultural Rural & Environmental Health (I.ARE.H), Wing 3E, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W8, Canada.
Aging Ment Health. 2004 May;8(3):256-65. doi: 10.1080/1360786041000166796.
Although one in four seniors currently lives in a rural area, little is known about the capacity of rural nursing homes to provide specialized dementia services. The physical and social environments are increasingly recognized as important factors in the quality of life and functional ability of persons with dementia. This study compared eight rural nursing homes (those located in centres with populations < or =15,000) that had created dementia Special Care Units (SCUs) to eight same-sized rural nursing homes that did not have SCUs. Outcomes were assessed in relation to residents, staff, family members, and the environment. In this paper we describe the overall study design and findings from the environmental assessment. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the SCU versus non-SCU environments on the nine dimensions of the Physical Environmental Assessment Protocol (PEAP), which was used to assess the physical environment. The SCUs were more supportive on six dimensions: maximizing awareness and orientation, maximizing safety and security, regulation of stimulation, quality of stimulation, opportunities for personal control, and continuity of the self. Analysis of variance was also used to compare the groups on the six subscales of the Nursing Unit Rating Scale (NURS), which assesses the social environment of dementia care settings. The SCUs were more supportive on the Separation and Stimulation subscales, indicating that SCUs had greater separation of residents with dementia from other residents for activities of daily living and programming, and better control of non-meaningful stimulation.
尽管目前四分之一的老年人生活在农村地区,但对于农村养老院提供专业痴呆症服务的能力却知之甚少。物理和社会环境越来越被认为是影响痴呆症患者生活质量和功能能力的重要因素。本研究将八家设立了痴呆症特殊护理单元(SCU)的农村养老院(位于人口≤15000的中心地区)与八家规模相同但未设立SCU的农村养老院进行了比较。从居民、工作人员、家庭成员和环境等方面对结果进行了评估。在本文中,我们描述了总体研究设计以及环境评估的结果。方差分析(ANOVA)用于比较SCU和非SCU环境在物理环境评估协议(PEAP)九个维度上的差异,该协议用于评估物理环境。SCU在六个维度上更具支持性:最大限度地提高认知和方向感、最大限度地提高安全性、刺激调节、刺激质量、个人控制机会以及自我连续性。方差分析还用于比较两组在护理单元评分量表(NURS)六个子量表上的差异,该量表用于评估痴呆症护理环境的社会环境。SCU在隔离和刺激子量表上更具支持性,这表明SCU在日常生活活动和规划中,能更好地将痴呆症患者与其他居民隔离开来,并能更好地控制无意义的刺激。