Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Dec 16;11:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-84.
Almost 90% of residents living in long-term care facilities have limited mobility which is associated with a loss of ability in activities of daily living, falls, increased risk of serious medical problems such as pressure ulcers, incontinence and a significant decline in health-related quality of life. For health workers caring for residents it may also increase the risk of injury. The effectiveness of rehabilitation to facilitate mobility has been studied with dedicated research assistants or extensively trained staff caregivers; however, few investigators have examined the effectiveness of techniques to encourage mobility by usual caregivers in long-term care facilities.
METHODS/DESIGN: This longitudinal, quasi-experimental study is designed to demonstrate the effect of the sit-to-stand activity carried out by residents in the context of daily care with health care aides. In three intervention facilities health care aides will prompt residents to repeat the sit-to-stand action on two separate occasions during each day and each evening shift as part of daily care routines. In three control facilities residents will receive usual care. Intervention and control facilities are matched on the ownership model (public, private for-profit, voluntary not-for-profit) and facility size. The dose of the mobility intervention is assessed through the use of daily documentation flowsheets in the health record. Resident outcome measures include: 1) the 30-second sit-to-stand test; 2) the Functional Independence Measure; 3) the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3; and, 4) the Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease.
There are several compelling reasons for this study: the widespread prevalence of limited mobility in this population; the rapid decline in mobility after admission to a long-term care facility; the importance of mobility to quality of life; the increased time (and therefore cost) required to care for residents with limited mobility; and, the increased risk of injury for health workers caring for residents who are unable to stand. The importance of these issues is magnified when considering the increasing number of people living in long-term care facilities and an aging population.
This clinical trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT01474616).
近 90%居住在长期护理机构的居民行动不便,这与日常生活活动能力丧失、跌倒、压疮、失禁和健康相关生活质量显著下降等严重医疗问题的风险增加有关。对于照顾居民的卫生工作者来说,这也可能增加受伤的风险。已经有研究专门的研究助理或经过广泛培训的工作人员护理员来研究康复促进活动能力的效果;然而,很少有研究人员研究通过长期护理机构的常规护理员鼓励活动能力的技术的效果。
方法/设计:本纵向、准实验研究旨在展示在保健助手日常护理中,让居民进行从坐到站的活动对居民的影响。在三个干预设施中,保健助手将在白天和晚上的班次中,每天两次在日常护理常规中提醒居民重复从坐到站的动作。在三个对照设施中,居民将接受常规护理。干预和对照设施在所有制模式(公有、私人营利、志愿非营利)和设施规模上相匹配。通过在健康记录中的日常记录流程图,评估活动能力干预的剂量。居民的结果评估指标包括:1)30 秒从坐到站测试;2)功能性独立性量表;3)健康效用指数 Mark 2 和 3;以及,4)生活质量-阿尔茨海默病。
这项研究有几个引人注目的原因:该人群中普遍存在活动能力受限的问题;入住长期护理机构后活动能力迅速下降;活动能力对生活质量的重要性;照顾活动能力受限的居民需要更多的时间(因此成本更高);以及,照顾无法站立的居民的卫生工作者受伤的风险增加。考虑到越来越多的人居住在长期护理机构和人口老龄化,这些问题更加重要。
这项临床试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(临床试验注册号:NCT01474616)。