Shapiro Johanna, Morrison Elizabeth, Boker John
Department of Family Medicine, University of California Irvine College of Medicine, USA.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004 Mar;17(1):73-84. doi: 10.1080/13576280310001656196.
Empathy is critical to the development of professionalism in medical students, and the humanities-particularly literature-have been touted as an effective tool for increasing student empathy. This quantitative/qualitative study was undertaken to assess whether reading and discussing poetry and prose related to patients and doctors could significantly increase medical student empathy and appreciation of the relevance of the humanities for their own professional development.
In 2000-2001, first year students (n=22) volunteered for an eight-session literature and medicine elective and were randomly assigned to either immediate participation in the class or a wait-list group, who participated in the same class 6 months later. Complete pre- and post-intervention data for 16 students from both groups were obtained for two quantitative measures of empathy and an attitudes-toward-the-humanities scale. Students also participated in a qualitative group interview pre- and post-intervention.
Empathy and attitudes toward the humanities improved significantly (p<0.01) after participation in the class when both groups of students were combined. The scaled treatment effect size was in the moderate range (> or =0.60 standard deviation units) for both measures that had statistically significant pre-to-post changes. Furthermore, student understanding of the patient's perspective became more detailed and complex after the intervention. Students were also more likely post-intervention to note ways reading literature could help them cope with training-related stress.
A brief literature-based course can contribute to greater student empathy and appreciation for the value of humanities in medical education.
同理心对于医学生职业素养的培养至关重要,而人文学科——尤其是文学——被视为增强学生同理心的有效工具。本定量/定性研究旨在评估阅读和讨论与患者及医生相关的诗歌和散文是否能显著提高医学生的同理心,并增进他们对人文学科与自身职业发展相关性的认识。
在2000 - 2001年,一年级学生(n = 22)自愿参加一门为期八节的文学与医学选修课,并被随机分为立即参加课程组或候补组,候补组在6个月后参加同一课程。从两组的16名学生中获取了干预前后完整的数据,用于两项同理心的定量测量以及一份对人文学科态度的量表。学生们还在干预前后参加了定性的小组访谈。
当两组学生合并计算时,参加课程后同理心和对人文学科的态度有显著改善(p < 0.01)。对于两项在干预前后有统计学显著变化的测量指标,标准化治疗效应大小处于中等范围(≥0.60标准差单位)。此外,干预后学生对患者视角的理解变得更加详细和复杂。干预后学生也更有可能指出阅读文学作品有助于他们应对与培训相关压力的方式。
一门简短的基于文学的课程有助于提高学生的同理心,并增进他们对医学教育中人文学科价值的认识。