Lechtzin Noah, Wiener Charles M, Clawson Lora, Davidson Matthew C, Anderson Fred, Gowda Neelam, Diette Gregory B
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 E. Monument Street, Fifth Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2004 Mar;5(1):9-15. doi: 10.1080/14660820310017335.
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is associated with improved survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and has been widely recommended. The extent of NIPPV use in ALS patients and the factors associated with its use have not been studied.
A cross-sectional study using the ALS Patient Care Database. Analyses were performed to assess the association of patient and care characteristics with use of ventilatory support.
1458 patients were studied. 15.6% used NIPPV and 2.1% used invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients who used NIPPV were significantly more likely to be male and have higher income than those who did not. They were also more likely to have a gastrostomy tube, lower vital capacity, more severe disease, bulbar involvement and poorer general health status as measured by the SF-12 and Sickness Impact Profile. Multivariate analysis revealed that lower FVC, higher income and use of gastrostomy tube were independently associated with use of NIPPV.
NIPPV is used more than seven times as frequently as invasive ventilation in ALS patients. Patients who use NIPPV have more severe disease than those who do not use any respiratory intervention. Patients with lower income are less likely to use NIPPV, which raises concerns about disparities in the care of patients with ALS.
无创正压通气(NIPPV)与肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者生存率的提高相关,并且已被广泛推荐。尚未对ALS患者使用NIPPV的程度及其使用相关因素进行研究。
一项使用ALS患者护理数据库的横断面研究。进行分析以评估患者及护理特征与通气支持使用之间的关联。
对1458例患者进行了研究。15.6%的患者使用了NIPPV,2.1%的患者使用了有创机械通气。使用NIPPV的患者比未使用的患者更可能为男性且收入更高。他们也更可能有胃造瘘管、肺活量更低、疾病更严重、有延髓受累,并且根据SF-12和疾病影响概况量表测量的总体健康状况更差。多变量分析显示,较低的用力肺活量(FVC)、较高的收入和胃造瘘管的使用与NIPPV的使用独立相关。
在ALS患者中,NIPPV的使用频率是有创通气的七倍多。使用NIPPV的患者比未进行任何呼吸干预的患者疾病更严重。低收入患者使用NIPPV的可能性较小,这引发了对ALS患者护理差异的担忧。