Greenaway L P, Martin N H, Lawrence V, Janssen A, Al-Chalabi A, Leigh P N, Goldstein L H
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
J Neurol. 2015;262(4):1002-13. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7665-z. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
The objective was to identify factors associated with decisions made by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to accept or decline non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and/or gastrostomy in a prospective population-based study. Twenty-one people with ALS, recruited from the South-East ALS Register who made an intervention decision during the study timeframe underwent a face-to-face in-depth interview, with or without their informal caregiver present. Sixteen had accepted an intervention (11 accepted gastrostomy, four accepted NIV and one accepted both interventions). Five patients had declined gastrostomy. Thematic analysis revealed three main themes: (1) patient-centric factors (including perceptions of control, acceptance and need, and aspects of fear); (2) external factors (including roles played by healthcare professionals, family, and information provision); and (3) the concept of time (including living in the moment and the notion of 'right thing, right time'). Many aspects of these factors were inter-related. Decision-making processes for the patients were found to be complex and multifaceted and reinforce arguments for individualised (rather than 'algorithm-based') approaches to facilitating decision-making by people with ALS who require palliative interventions.
在一项基于人群的前瞻性研究中,目的是确定与肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者接受或拒绝无创通气(NIV)和/或胃造口术决策相关的因素。从东南ALS登记处招募的21名在研究期间做出干预决策的ALS患者,在有或没有其非正式护理人员在场的情况下接受了面对面的深入访谈。16人接受了干预(11人接受胃造口术,4人接受无创通气,1人接受了两种干预)。5名患者拒绝了胃造口术。主题分析揭示了三个主要主题:(1)以患者为中心的因素(包括对控制、接受和需求的认知以及恐惧的方面);(2)外部因素(包括医疗保健专业人员、家庭所起的作用以及信息提供);(3)时间概念(包括活在当下以及“正确的事情,正确的时间”的观念)。这些因素的许多方面相互关联。发现患者的决策过程复杂且多面,并强化了对于采用个性化(而非“基于算法”)方法来促进需要姑息治疗干预的ALS患者进行决策的观点。