Hakeem R, Shaikh A H, Asar F
Department of Food and Nutrition, Rana Liaqat Ali Khan Government College of Home Economics, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Ann Hum Biol. 2004 May-Jun;31(3):282-91. doi: 10.1080/03014460310001658800.
The appropriateness of using international reference data for assessing growth of children and adolescents from developing countries has been debated. If the growth performance in at least those sections of the society that may be considered affluent has reached the levels represented by the international reference, the case for adoption of the NCHS reference would be strong. Findings from studies in younger children indicate appropriateness of these standards but data from older children are lacking.
The study aimed to compare the linear growth of affluent Pakistani adolescents living in Karachi with the NCHS reference so as to assess the appropriateness of using these standards for assessing the growth status of Pakistani adolescents.
Data were collected from 876 girls and 819 boys aged 10-15 years studying in well known and established affluent urban public schools in Karachi. A portable stadiometer (Minimeter by CMS, London) was used for measuring heights. Heights were compared using the United States Center for Disease Control (CDC 2000) reference values to assess growth status.
The mean ages of boys and girls were 12.82 and 12.63, respectively. Mean Height for Age Z score (HAZ) (-0.02) was very close to CDC 2000 reference values but the growth pattern was not similar. Younger children were relatively taller and the older children were shorter than CDC standards. Mean HAZ scores for 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15-year-old boys and girls were 1.12 and 1.03, 0.54 and 0.55, 0.47 and 0.26, 0.29 and -0.21, -0.08 and -0.64, -0.19 and -0.53, respectively. The mean HAZ for boys (0.12) was slightly higher and that for girls slightly lower (HAZ = -0.14) than the reference population. Even among the relatively affluent group of children studied HAZ scores increased with relative socio-economic status.
Although in terms of averages for 10-15-year-old boys and girls the height status was not very different from CDC standards, the growth curves of Pakistani children was slightly different from CDC 2000 standards. Further studies are needed to assess the appropriateness of using international growth standards for assessing height status of Pakistani adolescents.
使用国际参考数据来评估发展中国家儿童和青少年的生长情况是否合适一直存在争议。如果至少社会中那些可被视为富裕阶层的人群的生长水平已达到国际参考标准所代表的水平,那么采用美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)参考标准的理由就很充分。针对年幼儿童的研究结果表明这些标准是合适的,但针对大龄儿童的数据却很缺乏。
本研究旨在比较生活在卡拉奇的富裕的巴基斯坦青少年的线性生长情况与NCHS参考标准,以便评估使用这些标准来评估巴基斯坦青少年生长状况的合适性。
数据收集自876名年龄在10至15岁的女孩和819名年龄在10至15岁的男孩,他们就读于卡拉奇久负盛名且条件优越的城市公立学校。使用便携式身高计(伦敦CMS公司的Minimeter)测量身高。利用美国疾病控制中心(CDC 2000)的参考值来比较身高,以评估生长状况。
男孩和女孩的平均年龄分别为12.82岁和12.63岁。年龄别身高Z评分(HAZ)的平均值(-0.02)非常接近CDC 2000参考值,但生长模式并不相同。年幼儿童相对较高,而大龄儿童比CDC标准更矮。10、11、12、13、14和15岁男孩和女孩的平均HAZ评分分别为1.12和1.03、0.54和0.55、0.47和0.26、0.29和 -0.21、-0.08和 -0.64、-0.19和 -0.53。男孩的平均HAZ(0.12)略高于参考人群,女孩的平均HAZ(HAZ = -0.14)略低于参考人群。即使在研究的相对富裕的儿童群体中,HAZ评分也随着相对社会经济地位的提高而增加。
虽然10至15岁男孩和女孩的平均身高状况与CDC标准差异不大,但巴基斯坦儿童的生长曲线与CDC 2000标准略有不同。需要进一步研究以评估使用国际生长标准来评估巴基斯坦青少年身高状况的合适性。