Porter Megan L, Pérez-Losada Marcos, Crandall Keith A
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Nov;37(2):355-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.06.021. Epub 2005 Aug 19.
Phylogenetic relationships among all of the major decapod infraorders have never been estimated using molecular data, while morphological studies produce conflicting results. In the present study, the phylogenetic relationships among the decapod basal suborder Dendrobranchiata and all of the currently recognized decapod infraorders within the suborder Pleocyemata (Caridea, Stenopodidea, Achelata, Astacidea, Thalassinidea, Anomala, and Brachyura) were inferred using 16S mtDNA, 18S and 28S rRNA, and the histone H3 gene. Phylogenies were reconstructed using the model-based methods of maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods coupled with Markov Chain Monte Carlo inference. The phylogenies revealed that the seven infraorders are monophyletic, with high clade support values (bp>70; pP>0.95) under both methods. The two suborders also were recovered as monophyletic, but with weaker support (bp=70; pP=0.74). Although the nodal support values for infraordinal relationships were low (bp<50; pP<0.77) the Anomala and Brachyura were basal to the rest of the 'Reptantia' in both reconstructions and using Bayesian tree topology tests alternate morphology-based hypotheses were rejected (P<0.01). Newly developed multi-locus Bayesian and likelihood heuristic rate-smoothing methods to estimate divergence times were compared using eight fossil and geological calibrations. Estimated times revealed that the Decapoda originated earlier than 437MYA and that the radiation within the group occurred rapidly, with all of the major lineages present by 325MYA. Node time estimation under both approaches is severely affected by the number and phylogenetic distribution of the fossil calibrations chosen. For analyses incorporating fossils as fixed ages, more consistent results were obtained by using both shallow and deep or clade-related calibration points. Divergence time estimation using fossils as lower and upper limits performed well with as few as one upper limit and a single deep fossil lower limit calibration.
所有主要十足目下目之间的系统发育关系从未通过分子数据进行估计,而形态学研究则产生了相互矛盾的结果。在本研究中,利用16S线粒体DNA、18S和28S核糖体RNA以及组蛋白H3基因,推断了十足目基部亚目枝鳃亚目与目前公认的腹胚亚目(真虾下目、猬虾下目、螯虾下目、海螯虾下目、蝼蛄虾下目、异尾下目和短尾下目)内所有十足目下目之间的系统发育关系。使用基于模型的最大似然法和贝叶斯方法以及马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗推理重建系统发育树。系统发育树显示,这七个下目是单系的,在两种方法下都有较高的分支支持值(自展值>70;后验概率>0.95)。这两个亚目也被恢复为单系,但支持较弱(自展值=70;后验概率=0.74)。尽管下目间关系的节点支持值较低(自展值<50;后验概率<0.77),但在两种重建中,异尾下目和短尾下目都位于“爬行亚目”其他类群的基部,并且使用贝叶斯树拓扑检验拒绝了基于形态学的替代假说(P<0.01)。使用八个化石和地质校准点,比较了新开发的多位点贝叶斯和似然启发式速率平滑方法来估计分歧时间。估计时间显示,十足目起源于4.37亿年前之前,该类群内的辐射迅速发生,到3.25亿年前所有主要谱系都已出现。两种方法下的节点时间估计都受到所选化石校准的数量和系统发育分布的严重影响。对于将化石作为固定年龄纳入的分析,通过使用浅和深或与类群相关的校准点获得了更一致的结果。使用化石作为下限和上限进行分歧时间估计时,仅使用一个上限和一个单一的深化石下限校准就表现良好。