Tremblay François, Mireault Annie-Claude, Dessureault Liam, Manning Hélène, Sveistrup Heidi
School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Aug;157(3):275-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1830-4. Epub 2004 Jun 15.
In this study, we compared the ability of young (n=10, 19-32 years) and older subjects (n=35, 60-86 years) to use fingertip contact as a balance aid during quiet stance under various conditions to determine whether aging would influence contact strategies. Experimental trials (duration, 60 s) included two visual conditions (vision; no vision), three fingertip contact conditions (no touch; smooth touch; rough touch) and two support surface conditions (firm; foam). In trials with contact, participants were required to maintain a light contact with their right index fingertip on an instrumented touch-plate. Subjects were not constrained to exert minimal contact force, although they were aware that the touch-plate was not designed for physical support. From displacements of the centre of foot pressure (COP), mean sway amplitude (MSA) was computed in the anterior-posterior (COP(AP)) and medio-lateral (COP(ML)) directions. Subjective estimates of stability were also obtained by asking participants to rate perceived stability on a visual analog scale in each condition. Mean normal force (FN) and mean resultant tangential force (F(TAN)) were computed from contact force data applied on the touch plate. In both age groups, touch conditions had a substantial effect on MSA in the AP direction under both support surface conditions, with reductions averaging between 40-55% when touch was allowed. Reductions in the ML direction, though less important (8-12% on average), were nevertheless highly significant, especially in the older subjects when standing on the foam. In the two groups, vision and texture had only marginal impact on MSA computed on both support surfaces. Contrasting with sway measurements, stability ratings were highly influenced by visual conditions in both age groups. Only in conditions of deficient support (foam surface) and absent vision did the perceived effect of touch exceed that of vision. Age had a major impact, however, on contact forces deployed during trials with touch. While individuals in the young group typically produced forces of <1 N (mean FN, 0.32+/-0.15 N) to achieve postural stabilization, older subjects tended to use higher, though not too excessive, contact forces (mean FN, 1.21+/-0.75 N) under the same conditions. From these findings, we conclude that the ability to use contact cues from the fingertip as a source of sensory information to improve postural stability is largely preserved in healthy older adults. The increase in contact force deployed by older individuals to achieve postural stabilization is interpreted as a compensatory strategy to help overcome age-related loss in tactile sensation, an issue that will be further addressed in a companion paper.
在本研究中,我们比较了年轻受试者(n = 10,19 - 32岁)和年长受试者(n = 35,60 - 86岁)在各种条件下安静站立时利用指尖接触作为平衡辅助的能力,以确定衰老是否会影响接触策略。实验测试(持续时间60秒)包括两种视觉条件(有视觉;无视觉)、三种指尖接触条件(无接触;平滑接触;粗糙接触)和两种支撑表面条件(坚硬;泡沫)。在有接触的测试中,要求参与者用右手食指在装有仪器的触摸板上保持轻微接触。受试者不受限于施加最小接触力,尽管他们知道触摸板不是用于物理支撑的。根据足底压力中心(COP)的位移,计算前后方向(COP(AP))和内外方向(COP(ML))的平均摆动幅度(MSA)。还通过要求参与者在每种条件下在视觉模拟量表上对感知到的稳定性进行评分来获得稳定性的主观估计。根据施加在触摸板上的接触力数据计算平均法向力(FN)和平均合成切向力(F(TAN))。在两个年龄组中,在两种支撑表面条件下,触摸条件对AP方向的MSA都有显著影响,允许触摸时平均降低40 - 55%。ML方向的降低虽然不太明显(平均8 - 12%),但仍然非常显著,尤其是年长受试者站在泡沫上时。在两组中,视觉和质地对在两种支撑表面上计算的MSA只有轻微影响。与摆动测量结果形成对比的是,稳定性评分在两个年龄组中都受到视觉条件的高度影响。只有在支撑不足(泡沫表面)和无视觉的条件下,触摸的感知效果才超过视觉。然而,年龄对有触摸的测试过程中施加的接触力有重大影响。虽然年轻组的个体通常产生小于1 N的力(平均FN,0.32±0.15 N)来实现姿势稳定,但年长受试者在相同条件下倾向于使用更高但不过度的接触力(平均FN,1.21±0.75 N)。从这些发现中,我们得出结论,在健康的老年人中,利用来自指尖的接触线索作为感觉信息来源以改善姿势稳定性的能力在很大程度上得以保留。年长个体为实现姿势稳定而增加的接触力被解释为一种补偿策略,以帮助克服与年龄相关的触觉丧失,这一问题将在一篇配套论文中进一步探讨。