Santagati A, Ceci V, Donatelli G, Pasqualini M J, Silvestri F, Pitasi F, Sportelli G, Fiocca F
Surgery Department "P. Stefanini", University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2003 Nov-Dec;7(6):175-80.
In this retrospective, comparative study a total of 107 patients, presenting with malignant inoperable strictures of common bile duct, due to a pancreatico-biliary malignancy, underwent palliative treatments. In a group, consisting of 82 patients (76.64%), endoscopic stenting procedures were performed; polyethylene stents or self-expanding metal stents were applied in 37 and 45 patients, respectively. The prerequisites for a successful endoscopic stenting were a) accuracy of diagnosis and b) exclusion of patients presenting with tumors potentially treatable by a curative resection. In the other group, consisting of 25 patients (23.36%), biliary-enteric bypass procedures were performed. Endoscopic treatment was successful in 97.5% of the cases (80/82); complication rate was 7.3% (6 patients on 82), and mortality rate was 3.6% (3 patients on 82). Median hospital stay was 13.4 and 7.3 days in patients treated with plastic stents and metallic stents, respectively. Bypass surgery was successful in 99% of the cases (24/25); complication rate was 24% (6 patients on 25), and mortality rate was 16% (4 patients on 25). Median hospital stay was 26 days. For the patients in whom a curative resection could not be performed, both the above mentioned methods resulted in a high rate of immediate technical and therapeutic success. However, the surgical approach showed a significantly higher rate in procedure-related mortality and morbidity; in addition, the hospital stay lasted longer in surgically treated patients. The patients who are definitely unsuitable for curative resection are better managed by positioning a stent. The use of metal stents should be preferred in those less serious patients who may supposedly survive longer.
在这项回顾性比较研究中,共有107例因胰胆管恶性肿瘤导致无法手术切除的胆总管恶性狭窄患者接受了姑息治疗。其中一组82例患者(76.64%)接受了内镜支架置入术,分别有37例和45例患者应用了聚乙烯支架或自膨式金属支架。成功进行内镜支架置入的前提条件是:a)诊断准确;b)排除可通过根治性切除治愈的肿瘤患者。另一组25例患者(23.36%)接受了胆肠吻合术。内镜治疗成功率为97.5%(80/82);并发症发生率为7.3%(82例中有6例),死亡率为3.6%(82例中有3例)。接受塑料支架和金属支架治疗的患者中位住院时间分别为13.4天和7.3天。旁路手术成功率为99%(24/25);并发症发生率为24%(25例中有6例),死亡率为16%(25例中有4例)。中位住院时间为26天。对于无法进行根治性切除的患者,上述两种方法均取得了较高的即刻技术成功率和治疗成功率。然而,手术治疗的手术相关死亡率和发病率显著更高;此外,手术治疗患者的住院时间更长。对于绝对不适合根治性切除的患者,放置支架是更好的治疗方法。对于可能存活时间较长的病情较轻的患者,应优先使用金属支架。