Suppr超能文献

胰头癌或远端胆管树癌患者梗阻性黄疸的姑息治疗。内镜下支架置入术与肝空肠吻合术的比较。

Palliative treatment of obstructive jaundice in patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic head or distal biliary tree. Endoscopic stent placement vs. hepaticojejunostomy.

作者信息

Distler Marius, Kersting Stephan, Rückert Felix, Dobrowolski Frank, Miehlke Stephan, Grützmann Robert, Saeger Hans-Detlev

机构信息

Department of General, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Technical University Hospital, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

JOP. 2010 Nov 9;11(6):568-74.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Palliative procedures play an important role in the treatment of malignancies of the pancreatic head/distal biliary tree, as only 20-30% can be cured by surgical resection.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if surgical or non-surgical management was the most appropriate therapy for the treatment of obstructive jaundice in the palliative setting.

SETTING

High volume center for pancreatic surgery.

PATIENTS

Analysis of 342 palliatively-treated patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head or the distal biliary tree.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We studied the outcomes with regard to treatment, complications and survival times.

DESIGN

The patients were divided into three groups. Group 1: endoscopic bile duct endoprosthesis (no. 138, 56%); Group 2: preoperative stenting followed by laparotomy (if patients were found to be unresectable, palliative hepaticojejunostomy was performed) (no. 68, 28%); Group 3: hepaticojejunostomy without preoperative stenting (no. 41, 16%). We also determined the frequency of re-hospitalization for recurrent jaundice.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-one (76%) patients showed obstructive jaundice. Mortality in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 2.2%, 0%, and 2.4%, respectively and morbidity was 5.1%, 17.6%, and 14.6%, respectively. The mean interval between stent exchanges was 70.8 days. Median survival for patients treated only with an endoscopic stent (Group 1) was significantly shorter than that of patients who were first stented and subsequently treated with hepaticojejunostomy (Group 2) (5.1 vs. 9.4 months; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepaticojejunostomy can be performed with satisfactory operative results and acceptable morbidity. Considering that biliary stents can occlude, a hepaticojejunostomy may be superior to endoscopic stenting; hepaticojejunostomy should be especially favored in patients whose disease is first found to be unresectable intraoperatively.

摘要

背景

姑息性手术在胰头/远端胆管树恶性肿瘤的治疗中发挥着重要作用,因为只有20%-30%的患者可通过手术切除治愈。

目的

我们试图确定手术或非手术治疗在姑息治疗中是否是治疗梗阻性黄疸的最合适疗法。

地点

胰腺手术量大的中心。

患者

对342例接受姑息治疗的胰头或远端胆管树腺癌患者进行分析。

主要观察指标

我们研究了治疗效果、并发症和生存时间。

设计

将患者分为三组。第1组:内镜胆管内支架置入术(138例,56%);第2组:术前支架置入后行剖腹手术(如果发现患者无法切除,则行姑息性肝空肠吻合术)(68例,28%);第3组:未行术前支架置入的肝空肠吻合术(41例,16%)。我们还确定了因复发性黄疸再次住院的频率。

结果

261例(76%)患者出现梗阻性黄疸。第1、2、3组的死亡率分别为2.2%、0%和2.4%,发病率分别为5.1%、17.6%和14.6%。支架更换的平均间隔时间为70.8天。仅接受内镜支架治疗的患者(第1组)的中位生存期明显短于先接受支架置入并随后接受肝空肠吻合术治疗的患者(第2组)(5.1个月对9.4个月;P<0.001)。

结论

肝空肠吻合术的手术效果良好,发病率可接受。考虑到胆管支架可能会堵塞,肝空肠吻合术可能优于内镜支架置入术;对于术中首次发现无法切除的患者,尤其应优先选择肝空肠吻合术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验