Szucs A, Vehovszky A, Molnár G, Pinto R D, Abarbanel H D I
Balaton Limnological Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 35, H-8237 Tihany, Hungary.
Neuroscience. 2004;126(4):1063-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.04.015.
Spectrally broadband stimulation of neurons has been an effective method for studying their dynamic responses to simulated synaptic inputs. Previous studies with such stimulation were mostly based upon the direct intracellular injection of noisy current waveforms. In the present study we analyze and compare the firing output of various identified molluscan neurons to aperiodic, broadband current signals using three types of stimulus paradigms: 1. direct injection in current clamp mode, 2. conductance injection using electrotonic coupling of the input waveform to the neuron, and 3. conductance injection using a simulated chemical excitatory connection. The current waveforms were presented in 15 successive trials and the trial-to-trial variations of the spike responses were analyzed using peri-stimulus spike density functions. Comparing the responses of the neurons to the same type of input waveforms, we found that conductance injection resulted in more reliable and precise spike responses than direct current injection. The statistical parameters of the response spike trains depended on the spectral distribution of the input. The reliability increased with increasing cutoff frequency, while the temporal jitter of spikes changed in the opposite direction. Neurons with endogenous bursting displayed lower reproducibility in their responses to noisy waveforms when injected directly; however, they fired far more reliably and precisely when receiving the same waveforms as conductance inputs. The results show that molluscan neurons are capable of accurately reproducing their responses to synaptic inputs. Conductance injection provides an enhanced experimental technique for assessing the neurons' spike timing reliability and it should be preferred over direct current injection of noisy waveforms.
对神经元进行光谱宽带刺激一直是研究其对模拟突触输入动态反应的有效方法。以往此类刺激的研究大多基于直接向细胞内注入噪声电流波形。在本研究中,我们使用三种刺激范式分析并比较了各种已识别的软体动物神经元对非周期性宽带电流信号的放电输出:1. 电流钳模式下的直接注入;2. 通过将输入波形与神经元进行电紧张耦合的电导注入;3. 使用模拟化学兴奋性连接的电导注入。电流波形以连续15次试验呈现,并使用刺激周围放电密度函数分析了放电反应的逐次试验变化。比较神经元对相同类型输入波形的反应,我们发现电导注入比直接电流注入产生更可靠、更精确的放电反应。反应放电序列的统计参数取决于输入的频谱分布。可靠性随截止频率的增加而提高,而放电的时间抖动则朝相反方向变化。具有内源性爆发活动的神经元在直接注入时对噪声波形的反应再现性较低;然而,当作为电导输入接收相同波形时,它们放电的可靠性和精确性要高得多。结果表明,软体动物神经元能够准确再现其对突触输入的反应。电导注入为评估神经元放电时间可靠性提供了一种增强的实验技术,应优先于对噪声波形的直接电流注入。