Suppr超能文献

一大群强迫症患者中轴I和轴II共病情况

Axis I and II comorbidity in a large sample of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

作者信息

Denys Damiaan, Tenney Nienke, van Megen Harold J G M, de Geus Femke, Westenberg Herman G M

机构信息

University Medical Center (B.01.206), P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2004 Jun;80(2-3):155-62. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00056-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No study has reported yet on the prevalence of both comorbid DSM-IV axis I and personality disorders in a large cohort of OCD patients, and little is known about differences in clinical characteristics between OCD patients with and without comorbid symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the cross-sectional prevalence of comorbid DSM-IV axis I, and personality disorders in a population of patients with primary obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

METHOD

420 outpatients with OCD were evaluated for comorbid pathology, demographic, and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Forty-six percent of the patients were diagnosed with a comorbid disorder. Twenty-seven percent met the criteria for at least one comorbid axis I disorder, 15.6 percent for a comorbid personality disorder, and 20.4 percent for both a comorbid axis I disorder and a personality disorder.

LIMITATIONS

A limitation of the current study is that the sample was drawn from a psychiatric department specialised in anxiety disorders, which might have underestimated the rate of comorbid diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Comorbid diagnoses occur less frequently than would be expected on the basis of comparable comorbidity studies in OCD. Associated axis I comorbidity did not affect clinical severity of OCD, but was related to higher levels of depression and anxiety, whereas axis II comorbidity impaired to a higher extent the overall functioning.

摘要

背景

尚无研究报道大量强迫症患者中同时存在共病的DSM-IV轴I障碍和人格障碍的患病率,对于有共病症状和无共病症状的强迫症患者临床特征的差异也知之甚少。

目的

研究原发性强迫症(OCD)患者中共病的DSM-IV轴I障碍和人格障碍的横断面患病率。

方法

对420名强迫症门诊患者进行共病病理、人口统计学和临床特征评估。

结果

46%的患者被诊断为共病障碍。27%的患者符合至少一种共病轴I障碍的标准,15.6%的患者符合共病性人格障碍的标准,20.4%的患者同时符合共病轴I障碍和人格障碍的标准。

局限性

本研究的一个局限性是样本来自一个专门治疗焦虑症的精神科,这可能低估了共病诊断的发生率。

结论

与强迫症中类似共病研究预期的情况相比,共病诊断的发生率较低。相关的轴I共病不影响强迫症的临床严重程度,但与更高水平的抑郁和焦虑有关,而轴II共病在更大程度上损害了整体功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验