Rohan Kelly J, Lindsey Kathryn Tierney, Roecklein Kathryn A, Lacy Timothy J
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-4799, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2004 Jun;80(2-3):273-83. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00098-3.
The need to develop supplementary or alternative treatments for seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is underscored by the significant minority (47%) of SAD patients that is refractory to light therapy, the persistence of residual symptoms despite light treatment, and poor long-term compliance with light use. Because preliminary studies suggest that cognitive and behavioral factors are involved in SAD, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) warrants investigation as a possible treatment option.
We piloted a 6-week randomized clinical trial to compare a standard light therapy protocol; a novel, SAD-tailored, group CBT intervention; and their combination in ameliorating and remitting a current SAD episode and as prophylaxis against episode recurrence. Depressive symptom severity and remission rates were assessed at post-treatment and at a 1-year follow-up visit to examine long-term treatment durability.
CBT, light therapy, and their combination all demonstrated significant reductions in depressive symptoms on two different outcome measures. Remission rates varied by measure, but did not reach statistical significance. During the subsequent winter, CBT, particularly in combination with light therapy, appeared to improve long-term outcome regarding symptom severity, remission rates, and relapse rates. No CBT-treated participant, with or without light, experienced a full SAD relapse compared to over 60% of those treated with light alone.
These results should be viewed as preliminary and are limited by the small sample size (n=23) and lack of a control group.
The nearly half of SAD patients who do not remit with light alone may benefit from CBT as an adjunct or alternative treatment, especially as a prophylaxis against episode recurrence.
季节性情感障碍(SAD)患者中有相当一部分(47%)对光疗法无效,尽管进行了光疗仍有残留症状,且长期使用光疗的依从性较差,这凸显了开发SAD补充或替代疗法的必要性。由于初步研究表明认知和行为因素与SAD有关,认知行为疗法(CBT)作为一种可能的治疗选择值得研究。
我们进行了一项为期6周的随机临床试验,比较标准光疗方案;一种新颖的、针对SAD量身定制的团体CBT干预;以及它们在改善和缓解当前SAD发作以及预防发作复发方面的联合应用。在治疗后和1年随访时评估抑郁症状严重程度和缓解率,以检查长期治疗效果。
CBT、光疗及其联合应用在两种不同的结局指标上均显示出抑郁症状显著减轻。缓解率因指标而异,但未达到统计学显著性。在随后的冬季,CBT,尤其是与光疗联合应用时,在症状严重程度、缓解率和复发率方面似乎改善了长期结局。与仅接受光疗的患者中超过60%经历完全的SAD复发相比,接受CBT治疗的参与者,无论是否接受光疗,均未出现完全复发。
这些结果应被视为初步结果,受样本量小(n = 23)和缺乏对照组的限制。
近一半单独使用光疗未缓解的SAD患者可能从CBT作为辅助或替代治疗中获益,尤其是作为预防发作复发的措施。