Suppr超能文献

贝克抑郁量表第二版反应和缓解切点的校准,用于监测季节性情感障碍治疗结果。

Calibration of response and remission cut-points on the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition for monitoring seasonal affective disorder treatment outcomes.

机构信息

Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2012 Apr;138(1-2):123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to define treatment response and remission cut-point scores for the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) when used to monitor seasonal affective disorder (SAD) treatment.

METHODS

Data from two published randomized clinical trials for SAD were utilized to complete a ROC analysis to define response and remission thresholds for the BDI-II. The Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-Seasonal Affective Disorder Version (SIGH-SAD) was used as a reference standard. Data from the two trials included BDI-II and SIGH-SAD scores for patients at baseline, 6 weeks (post-treatment), and 1 year (next winter).

RESULTS

BDI-II score of ≤ 9 was the derived criterion for remission of SAD, and BDI-II score decrease of 50% from baseline was the criterion for treatment response.

LIMITATIONS

Study participants were primarily female (94%) and Caucasian (80%) so demographic diversity of the sample was limited.

CONCLUSION

This study validated BDI-II scores compared to the SIGH-SAD reference standard. The BDI-II has greater potential for widespread use by clinicians than the SIGH-SAD to monitor SAD patients because it is a brief self-report instrument that can be conveniently administered in the waiting room.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在为贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II)确定治疗反应和缓解的截断分数,用于监测季节性情感障碍(SAD)的治疗。

方法

利用两项已发表的 SAD 随机临床试验的数据进行 ROC 分析,以确定 BDI-II 的反应和缓解阈值。汉密尔顿抑郁量表季节性情感障碍版(SIGH-SAD)的结构化访谈指南被用作参考标准。两项试验的数据包括患者在基线、6 周(治疗后)和 1 年(下一个冬季)时的 BDI-II 和 SIGH-SAD 评分。

结果

BDI-II 评分≤9 是 SAD 缓解的判定标准,BDI-II 评分从基线下降 50%是治疗反应的判定标准。

局限性

研究参与者主要为女性(94%)和白种人(80%),因此样本的人口统计学多样性有限。

结论

本研究验证了 BDI-II 评分与 SIGH-SAD 参考标准的相关性。与 SIGH-SAD 相比,BDI-II 更有可能被临床医生广泛用于监测 SAD 患者,因为它是一种简短的自我报告工具,可以在候诊室方便地进行管理。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验