Singh Ilina
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Center for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3RF, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Sep;59(6):1193-205. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.01.011.
In debates over diagnoses of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and use of the drug Ritalin among the American school age population, discussion often centers around who is to blame for rising diagnoses and increasing use of Ritalin. Parents have come under particular scrutiny by critics who associate ADHD behaviors in children with poor parenting and view Ritalin as a "quick-fix" for socially situated problems. Biologically oriented researchers of ADHD, on the other hand have posited organically based dysfunction as the cause of ADHD behaviors. This paper explores the problem of blame in relation to ADHD diagnoses and Ritalin use from the perspective of mothers of boys with ADHD. Qualitative interviews with mothers suggest that medicalization of problematic behaviors in young boys includes an inherent narrative of blame transformation; this transformation can be expressed as a binarism: mother-blame-brain-blame. The first two sections of the paper document mothers' experiences of blame for their sons' symptomatic behaviors against the background of a cultural mothering ideology. The third section considers the promise of absolution from mother-blame inherent in the transformative binary structure. I argue that medicalization of boys' problem behaviors supports and reconstitutes the potential for mother-blame and does little to pierce oppressive cultural mothering ideals.
在美国学龄人口中关于注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的诊断以及利他林药物使用的争论中,讨论常常围绕谁应该为ADHD诊断增加和利他林使用增多负责。批评者对家长进行了特别审查,这些批评者将儿童的ADHD行为与不良育儿方式联系起来,并将利他林视为解决社会问题的“快速解决方案”。另一方面,ADHD的生物学导向研究者认为基于器官的功能障碍是ADHD行为的原因。本文从患有ADHD男孩的母亲的角度探讨了与ADHD诊断和利他林使用相关的责任问题。对母亲的定性访谈表明,对小男孩问题行为的医学化包含了一种固有的责任转变叙事;这种转变可以表现为一种二元对立:母亲受责-大脑受责。本文的前两部分记录了在一种文化育儿观念背景下,母亲们因其儿子的症状行为而受到指责的经历。第三部分考虑了在这种转变性二元结构中,免除母亲受责的可能性。我认为,男孩问题行为的医学化支持并重构了母亲受责的可能性,对打破压迫性的文化育儿观念作用甚微。