Lang Catherine E, Schieber Marc H
Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, St. Mary's Hospital, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Nov;92(5):2802-10. doi: 10.1152/jn.00480.2004. Epub 2004 Jun 22.
We studied the extent to which mechanical coupling and neuromuscular control limit finger independence by studying passive and active individuated finger movements in healthy adults. For passive movements, subjects relaxed while each finger was rotated into flexion and extension by a custom-built device. For active movements, subjects moved each finger into flexion and extension while attempting to keep the other, noninstructed fingers still. Active movements were performed through approximately the same joint excursions and at approximately the same speeds as the passive movements. We quantified how mechanical coupling limited finger independence from the passive movements, and quantified how neuromuscular control limited finger independence using an analysis that subtracted the indices obtained in the passive condition from those obtained in the active condition. Finger independence was generally similar during passive and active movements, but showed a trend toward less independence in the middle, ring, and little fingers during active, large-arc movements. Mechanical coupling limited the independence of the index, middle, and ring fingers to the greatest degree, followed by the little finger, and placed only negligible limitations on the independence of the thumb. In contrast, neuromuscular control primarily limited the independence of the ring, and little fingers during large-arc movements, and had minimal effects on the other fingers, especially during small-arc movements. For the movement conditions tested here, mechanical coupling between the fingers appears to be a major factor limiting the complete independence of finger movement.
我们通过研究健康成年人被动和主动的个体化手指运动,来探究机械耦合和神经肌肉控制在多大程度上限制了手指的独立性。对于被动运动,受试者放松,每个手指由定制装置旋转至屈曲和伸展状态。对于主动运动,受试者将每个手指进行屈曲和伸展,同时试图让其他未得到指令的手指保持不动。主动运动的关节活动范围和速度与被动运动大致相同。我们通过分析量化了机械耦合如何通过被动运动限制手指独立性,以及通过从主动运动条件下获得的指标中减去被动运动条件下获得的指标来量化神经肌肉控制如何限制手指独立性。被动运动和主动运动期间手指独立性通常相似,但在主动的大幅度运动中,中指、无名指和小指的独立性呈现出降低的趋势。机械耦合对食指、中指和无名指独立性的限制程度最大,其次是小指,对拇指独立性的限制可忽略不计。相比之下,神经肌肉控制主要在大幅度运动中限制无名指和小指的独立性,对其他手指影响极小,尤其是在小幅度运动时。对于此处测试的运动条件,手指之间的机械耦合似乎是限制手指运动完全独立的主要因素。