Cocchi Marina, Franchini Giancarlo, Manzini Daniela, Manfredini Matteo, Marchetti Andrea, Ulrici Alessandro
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Chemistry, via G. Campi 183, 41100 Modena, Italy.
J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Jun 30;52(13):4047-56. doi: 10.1021/jf030712j.
A comparison of different digestion procedures has been carried out for the analysis of metal concentration in samples of vinegars and Aceto Balsamico Tradizionale of Modena (ABTM) coming from an unique barrel set. In particular, classical wet, dry ashing, and closed vessel microwave digestion procedure have been utilized and compared for each investigated species. In a few cases, direct metal determination on ABTM (without treatment procedure) is proposed as possible alternative to sample manipulation. Flame atomic absorption spectrometry was used for the quantification of iron and zinc, while graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry was used for all the other elements (i.e., chromium, manganese, cobalt, nickel, copper, cadmium, and lead). The comparison among the different sample treatments was carried out by the use of statistical and chemometric tools. In particular, principal component analysis and ANOVA approaches were used to discriminate between the diverse analytical methods. Furthermore, for all the dissolving techniques, the analytical metal recovery was always evaluated by the application of the recovery function on the same sample matrix. In general, the recoveries were fairly good, ranging from 90 to 103%, except for Cd and Pb with dry ashing, which showed recovery values close to 55% and 67%, respectively. As regards the metals concentration of the investigated samples, the experimental data reveal for some species the presence of concentration slightly over the legal limit fixed for wine and wine vinegar.
对来自同一组酒桶的醋和摩德纳传统香醋(ABTM)样品中的金属浓度分析,已开展了不同消解程序的比较。具体而言,针对每个被研究的种类,采用并比较了经典湿法、干法灰化和密闭容器微波消解程序。在少数情况下,建议对ABTM进行直接金属测定(无需处理程序),作为样品处理的可能替代方法。采用火焰原子吸收光谱法对铁和锌进行定量,而使用石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定所有其他元素(即铬、锰、钴、镍、铜、镉和铅)。通过使用统计和化学计量工具,对不同样品处理方法进行了比较。特别是,主成分分析和方差分析方法用于区分不同的分析方法。此外,对于所有溶解技术,通过对相同样品基质应用回收率函数,始终对分析金属回收率进行评估。总体而言,回收率相当不错,范围在90%至103%之间,但干法灰化处理镉和铅时,回收率分别接近55%和67%。关于所研究样品的金属浓度,实验数据显示,某些种类的浓度略高于葡萄酒和葡萄酒醋规定的法定限值。