Mersich Beatrix, RigO János, LEnArd Zsuzsanna, Studinger Péter, Visontai Zsuzsanna, Kollai Mark
Institute of Human Physiology and Clinical Experimental Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Clin Sci (Lond). 2004 Oct;107(4):407-13. doi: 10.1042/CS20040137.
Stiffening of the barosensory vessel wall in hypertension has been suggested to play a role in the associated baroreflex impairment. The carotid distensibility-BRS (baroreflex sensitivity) relationship, however, has not been studied in pre-eclampsia, a condition where hypertension is spontaneously reversible. Twelve normotensive pregnant women and 12 patients with pre-eclampsia matched for maternal age and week of gestation were studied in the third trimester and 3 months postpartum. Carotid artery diastolic diameter and pulsatile distension was measured by echo-wall tracking and carotid pulse pressure by applanation tonometry, and the carotid distensibility coefficient was calculated. Spontaneous BRS was determined by the sequence and spectral methods from 10 min continuous recording of ECG and finger arterial blood pressure. In the third trimester, carotid distensibility was lower in patients with pre-eclampsia than in normotensive pregnant women (2.47+/-0.17 compared with 4.08+/-0.16 x 10(-3)/mmHg); postpartum, it increased moderately in patients, but remained below normotensive values (3.25+/-0.12 compared with 4.25+/-0.19 x 10(-3)/mmHg). In the third trimester, both patients and healthy pregnant women had equally low BRS values; postpartum, the various BRS indices increased markedly (by 60-190%) and to the same level in both groups. No correlation was found between changes in carotid artery distensibility and those in BRS from the third trimester to postpartum period in patients and healthy pregnant women. The lack of association between changes in carotid distensibility and BRS suggest that stiffening of the carotid artery in pre-eclampsia is not responsible for baroreflex dysfunction.
高血压患者压力感受器血管壁的硬化被认为与相关的压力反射受损有关。然而,在子痫前期(一种高血压可自发逆转的疾病)中,颈动脉扩张性与压力反射敏感性(BRS)之间的关系尚未得到研究。对12名血压正常的孕妇和12名年龄及孕周相匹配的子痫前期患者在妊娠晚期和产后3个月进行了研究。通过超声壁跟踪测量颈动脉舒张直径和搏动性扩张,通过压平式眼压计测量颈动脉脉压,并计算颈动脉扩张系数。通过对心电图和手指动脉血压进行10分钟连续记录,采用序列法和频谱法测定自发BRS。在妊娠晚期,子痫前期患者的颈动脉扩张性低于血压正常的孕妇(分别为2.47±0.17与4.08±0.16×10⁻³/mmHg);产后,患者的颈动脉扩张性适度增加,但仍低于血压正常者的值(分别为3.25±0.12与4.25±0.19×10⁻³/mmHg)。在妊娠晚期,患者和健康孕妇的BRS值均同样较低;产后,两组的各种BRS指标均显著增加(增加60% - 190%)且达到相同水平。在患者和健康孕妇中,从妊娠晚期到产后,颈动脉扩张性的变化与BRS的变化之间未发现相关性。颈动脉扩张性变化与BRS之间缺乏关联表明,子痫前期患者颈动脉的硬化与压力反射功能障碍无关。