Mukhopadhyay Subhankar, Peiser Leanne, Gordon Siamon
Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK.
J Leukoc Biol. 2004 Sep;76(3):577-84. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0104014. Epub 2004 Jun 24.
Innate and adaptive immune activation of macrophages (Mphi) by microorganisms and antigen-activated lymphoid cells, respectively, plays an important role in host defense and immunopathology. Antigen-presenting cells express a range of pattern recognition receptors including the class A types I and II scavenger receptors (SR-A) and Toll-like receptors (TLR). Recognition of microbial products by SR-A and TLR controls uptake, killing, altered gene expression, and the adaptive immune response; however, the contribution of each receptor and interplay with cytokine stimuli such as interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) are not defined. We used Neisseria meningitidis (NM), a potent activator of innate immunity, and IFN-gamma, a prototypic T helper cell type 1 proinflammatory cytokine, to compare surface antigens, secretion of mediators, and receptor functions in elicited peritoneal Mphi from wild-type and genetically modified mouse strains. We show that these stimuli regulate major histocompatibility complex type II (MHC-II) and costimulatory molecules differentially, as well as expression of the mannose receptor and of Mphi receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO), a distinct SR-A, which provides a selective marker for innate activation. In combination, NM inhibited up-regulation of MHC-II by IFN-gamma while priming enhanced release of tumor necrosis factor alpha and nitric oxide. The SR-A contributes to phagocytosis of the organisms but not to their ability to induce CD80, CD86, and MARCO or to inhibit MHC-II. Conversely, studies with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-deficient organisms and/or TLR-4 mutant mice showed that LPS and TLR-4 are at least partially required to induce CD80, CD86, and MARCO, but LPS is not required to inhibit MHC-II. These studies provide an experimental model and identify surface markers for analysis of innate and acquired immune activation of Mphi.
微生物和抗原激活的淋巴细胞分别对巨噬细胞(Mphi)进行的固有免疫和适应性免疫激活,在宿主防御和免疫病理学中发挥着重要作用。抗原呈递细胞表达一系列模式识别受体,包括A类I型和II型清道夫受体(SR-A)以及Toll样受体(TLR)。SR-A和TLR对微生物产物的识别控制着摄取、杀伤、基因表达改变以及适应性免疫反应;然而,每种受体的作用以及与细胞因子刺激(如干扰素-γ (IFN-γ))的相互作用尚未明确。我们使用脑膜炎奈瑟菌(NM)(一种强大的固有免疫激活剂)和IFN-γ(一种典型的1型辅助性T细胞促炎细胞因子),比较野生型和基因改造小鼠品系中诱导产生的腹膜巨噬细胞的表面抗原、介质分泌和受体功能。我们发现,这些刺激对主要组织相容性复合体II类(MHC-II)和共刺激分子的调节存在差异,对甘露糖受体以及具有胶原结构的巨噬细胞受体(MARCO,一种独特的SR-A)的表达也有不同影响,MARCO是固有激活的一个选择性标志物。联合使用时,NM抑制IFN-γ对MHC-II的上调作用,同时引发增强肿瘤坏死因子α和一氧化氮的释放。SR-A有助于对这些微生物的吞噬作用,但对它们诱导CD80、CD86和MARCO的能力或抑制MHC-II的能力没有影响。相反,对缺乏脂多糖(LPS)的微生物和/或TLR-4突变小鼠的研究表明,诱导CD80、CD86和MARCO至少部分需要LPS和TLR-4,但抑制MHC-II不需要LPS。这些研究提供了一个实验模型,并确定了用于分析巨噬细胞固有免疫和获得性免疫激活的表面标志物。