• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Gemcitabine and cisplatin in refractory malignant lymphoma.

作者信息

Avilés Agustín, Neri Natividad, Huerta-Guzmán Judith, Fernández Raúl

机构信息

Oncology Research Unit, Mexican Social Security Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Oncology. 2004;66(3):197-200. doi: 10.1159/000077995.

DOI:10.1159/000077995
PMID:15218310
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We performed a pilot study to evaluate the effect of the high-dose gemcitabine-cisplatin combination in a brief weekly regimen in the treatment of primary refractory diffuse large cell lymphoma with high or high-intermediate clinical risk.

METHODS

Thirty patients refractory to first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated with a combination of gemcitabine (1.5 g/m(2) i.v.) and cisplatin (50 mg/m(2) i.v.) on days 1, 8, 22, 29, 42 and 49. No further treatment was administered.

RESULTS

Complete response rate was 53%; and only two relapses have been observed at the last follow-up. Thus actuarial disease-free survival at the 3-year follow-up was: 87% (95% confidence interval, CI: 70-93%) and overall survival 53% (95% CI: 44-63%). Toxicity was mild, and treatment was well tolerated. No treatment-related death was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The gemcitabine-cisplatin combination appears to be promising in the treatment of refractory lymphoma patients, with a low toxicity. However, a longer follow-up is needed to confirm the results. In our opinion, prolonged chemotherapy (6-8 cycles) did not improve outcome. At present, we are testing if the use of monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD20) employed as maintenance therapy may improve disease-free survival and overall survival.

摘要

相似文献

1
Gemcitabine and cisplatin in refractory malignant lymphoma.
Oncology. 2004;66(3):197-200. doi: 10.1159/000077995.
2
Gemcitabine, etoposide, cisplatin, and dexamethasone in patients with refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.吉西他滨、依托泊苷、顺铂和地塞米松用于难治性或复发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者。
Korean J Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(1):37-42. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2009.24.1.37.
3
A randomized study comparing two different schedules of administration of cisplatin in combination with gemcitabine in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.一项比较顺铂与吉西他滨联合应用于晚期非小细胞肺癌的两种不同给药方案的随机研究。
Cancer. 2000 Oct 15;89(8):1714-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1714::aid-cncr10>3.0.co;2-7.
4
Gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone (GEM-P) with or without Rituximab in relapsed and refractory patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).吉西他滨、顺铂和甲泼尼龙(GEM-P)联合或不联合利妥昔单抗用于复发难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者。
Hematology. 2007 Apr;12(2):149-53. doi: 10.1080/10245330701214095.
5
Weekly gemcitabine and monthly cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma.每周使用吉西他滨和每月使用顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌。
Semin Oncol. 1997 Jun;24(3 Suppl 8):S8-18-S8-23.
6
Weekly gemcitabine with monthly cisplatin: effective chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.每周使用吉西他滨联合每月使用顺铂:晚期非小细胞肺癌的有效化疗方案。
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Feb;15(2):744-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.2.744.
7
Biweekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine for patients with advanced urothelial cancer ineligible for cisplatin-based regimen.对于不符合基于顺铂方案的晚期尿路上皮癌患者,采用每两周一次的紫杉醇和吉西他滨治疗。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb;36(2):104-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyi220. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
8
Gemcitabine and treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in relapsed or refractory elderly patients: a prospective randomized trial in Algeria.吉西他滨与复发或难治性老年弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的治疗:阿尔及利亚的一项前瞻性随机试验
J Cancer Res Ther. 2010 Jan-Mar;6(1):41-6. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.63572.
9
Gemcitabine, ifosfamide, oxaliplatin and rituximab (R-GIFOX), a new effective cytoreductive/mobilizing salvage regimen for relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a pilot study.吉西他滨、异环磷酰胺、奥沙利铂和利妥昔单抗(R-GIFOX),一种用于复发难治性侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的新型有效减瘤/动员挽救方案:一项试点研究的结果
Ann Oncol. 2006 May;17 Suppl 4:iv18-24. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj994.
10
Gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone chemotherapy (GEM-P) is an effective regimen in patients with poor prognostic primary progressive or multiply relapsed Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.吉西他滨、顺铂和甲泼尼龙化疗方案(GEM-P)对于预后较差的原发性进行性或多次复发的霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者是一种有效的治疗方案。
Br J Haematol. 2003 Mar;120(6):970-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04226.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Gemcitabine, cisplatin, prednisone, and thalidomide for relapse and refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study from China.吉西他滨、顺铂、泼尼松和沙利度胺治疗复发难治性外周T细胞淋巴瘤:一项来自中国的回顾性研究。
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Sep 9;11:8277-8284. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S215585. eCollection 2019.
2
A new therapeutic approach in very refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.一种新的治疗方法在非常难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中的应用。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 May;22(5):703-707. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02172-1. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
3
Role of conventional salvage multiple-drug chemotherapy in relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
传统挽救性多药化疗在复发难治性侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤中的作用
Oncol Lett. 2010 Jul;1(4):679-683. doi: 10.3892/ol_00000119. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
4
Rituximab, gemcitabine, cisplatin, and dexamethasone in patients with refractory or relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma.利妥昔单抗、吉西他滨、顺铂和地塞米松治疗难治性或复发性侵袭性 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者。
Med Oncol. 2012 Dec;29(4):2409-16. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0211-2. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
5
Salvage therapy with gemcitabine, ifosfamide, dexamethasone, and oxaliplatin (GIDOX) for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a consortium for improving survival of lymphoma (CISL) trial.吉西他滨、异环磷酰胺、地塞米松和奥沙利铂(GIDOX)挽救性治疗 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤:改善淋巴瘤生存联盟(CISL)试验。
Invest New Drugs. 2011 Feb;29(1):154-60. doi: 10.1007/s10637-009-9320-y. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
6
Gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone (GEM-P) is an effective salvage regimen in patients with relapsed and refractory lymphoma.吉西他滨、顺铂和甲泼尼龙(GEM-P)是复发难治性淋巴瘤患者有效的挽救治疗方案。
Br J Cancer. 2005 Apr 25;92(8):1352-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602514.