• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴有下肢完全缺血的腘动脉钝性损伤:常规使用临时性腔内动脉分流管是否合理?

Blunt popliteal artery injury with complete lower limb ischemia: is routine use of temporary intraluminal arterial shunt justified?

作者信息

Hossny Ahmed

机构信息

Vascular Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menofia University, Egypt.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jul;40(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.003
PMID:15218463
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Complete lower limb ischemia as a result of blunt popliteal artery injury is associated with the highest morbidity and amputation rates among all of the peripheral vascular injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the possible benefits of routine use of a temporary intraluminal arterial shunt in patients with complete limb ischemia from blunt popliteal trauma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over 3 years seven blunt popliteal artery injuries with complete lower limb ischemia were managed with insertion of a shunt at the initial phase of the operation. Data from these procedures was analyzed and compared with retrospectively collected data for 10 injuries with complete ischemia treated without shunts during the preceding 5 years.

RESULTS

Mean injury severity score and mangled extremity severity score were 9.3 +/- 3.49 and 5.7 +/- 0.95, respectively, in the shunt group, and 9.9 +/- 3.57 and 5.9 +/- 0.56, respectively in the non-shunt group. Mean ischemic time was 244.3, 24.3, and 268.6 minutes, respectively, for preoperative, intraoperative, and total ischemic time in the shunt group, and 273, 56.5, and 329.5 minutes in the non-shunt group. The difference was significant for intraoperative (P <.001) and total (P <.05) ischemic time. In the entire group, 92.8% of patients with total ischemic time greater than 4 hours underwent fasciotomy, 100% required repeat operation, and 57.1% had complications and required fasciotomy wound debridement. All patients (100%) with ischemic time greater than 6 hours required amputation, compared with no patients with ischemic time less than 5 hours. One patient in the shunt group (14.3%) experienced one fasciotomy wound complication (11.1%), compared with seven patients in the non-shunt group (70%) had 8 complications (88.9%) (P <.05). Mean number of repeat operations was 0.8 +/- 1.06 in the shunt group, and 1.9 +/- 0.73 in the non-shunt group (P <.05). One patient in the shunt group (14.3%) required fasciotomy wound debridement, compared with seven patients in the non-shunt group (70%; P <.05). Mean hospital stay was 14.4 and 23 days, respectively, in the shunt and non-shunt groups (P <.05). Four limbs in the non-shunt group (40%) required amputation, compared with 100% limb salvage in the shunt group.

CONCLUSION

Temporary arterial shunting after blunt lower limb trauma significantly reduces total ischemic time, complications, repeat operations, amputation, and hospitalization. I recommend routine use of shunts in blunt popliteal artery injuries with complete lower limb ischemia.

摘要

目的

在所有周围血管损伤中,因腘动脉钝性损伤导致的下肢完全缺血与最高的发病率和截肢率相关。本研究的目的是确定在因腘动脉钝性创伤导致下肢完全缺血的患者中常规使用临时性腔内动脉分流管可能带来的益处。

患者与方法

在3年多的时间里,对7例因腘动脉钝性损伤导致下肢完全缺血的患者在手术初期插入分流管进行治疗。分析这些手术的数据,并与回顾性收集的前5年中10例未使用分流管治疗的完全缺血损伤患者的数据进行比较。

结果

分流管组的平均损伤严重程度评分和肢体毁损严重程度评分分别为9.3±3.49和5.7±0.95,非分流管组分别为9.9±3.57和5.9±0.56。分流管组术前、术中及总缺血时间的平均值分别为244.3、24.3和268.6分钟,非分流管组分别为273、56.5和329.5分钟。术中(P<.001)和总缺血时间(P<.05)差异有统计学意义。在整个组中,总缺血时间大于4小时的患者中有92.8%接受了筋膜切开术,100%需要再次手术,57.1%有并发症并需要进行筋膜切开伤口清创。所有缺血时间大于6小时的患者(100%)需要截肢,而缺血时间小于5小时的患者无一例需要截肢。分流管组有1例患者(14.3%)发生1例筋膜切开伤口并发症(11.1%),而非分流管组有7例患者(70%)发生8例并发症(88.9%)(P<.05)。分流管组再次手术的平均次数为0.8±1.06,非分流管组为1.9±0.73(P<.05)。分流管组有1例患者(14.3%)需要进行筋膜切开伤口清创,而非分流管组有7例患者(70%;P<.05)。分流管组和非分流管组的平均住院时间分别为14.4天和23天(P<.05)。非分流管组有4条肢体(40%)需要截肢,而分流管组的肢体保全率为100%。

结论

下肢钝性创伤后使用临时性动脉分流管可显著缩短总缺血时间、减少并发症、再次手术、截肢和住院时间。我建议在因腘动脉钝性损伤导致下肢完全缺血的患者中常规使用分流管。

相似文献

1
Blunt popliteal artery injury with complete lower limb ischemia: is routine use of temporary intraluminal arterial shunt justified?伴有下肢完全缺血的腘动脉钝性损伤:常规使用临时性腔内动脉分流管是否合理?
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jul;40(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.003.
2
Traumatic injuries of the popliteal and tibial arteries: limb ischemia and problems of surgical management.腘动脉和胫动脉创伤性损伤:肢体缺血及外科治疗问题
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2004;10(3):104-13.
3
Limb salvage and outcomes among patients with traumatic popliteal vascular injury: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.创伤性腘血管损伤患者的肢体挽救及预后:国家创伤数据库分析
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Jul;44(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.02.052.
4
Surgical treatment of 82 patients with diabetic lower limb ischemia by distal arterial bypass.82例糖尿病下肢缺血患者的远端动脉搭桥手术治疗
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Jan 20;120(2):106-9.
5
Multicenter evaluation of temporary intravascular shunt use in vascular trauma.血管创伤中临时血管内分流术应用的多中心评估
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Mar;80(3):359-64; discussion 364-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000949.
6
Invasive treatment of chronic limb ischemia according to the Lower Extremity Grading System (LEGS) score: a 6-month report.根据下肢分级系统(LEGS)评分对慢性肢体缺血进行侵入性治疗:6个月报告。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jun;39(6):1268-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.02.009.
7
Optimal conduit choice in the absence of single-segment great saphenous vein for below-knee popliteal bypass.在缺乏单段大隐静脉的情况下,用于膝下腘动脉旁路的最佳移植物选择。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):1008-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.042. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
8
Blunt vascular trauma in the extremity: diagnosis, management, and outcome.肢体钝性血管创伤:诊断、治疗及预后
J Trauma. 2003 Nov;55(5):814-24. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000087807.44105.AE.
9
Surgery for acute lower limb ischemia in the elderly population: results of a comparative study.老年人群急性下肢缺血的手术治疗:一项对比研究的结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;25(7):947-53. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.12.036. Epub 2011 May 28.
10
A comparison of the standard bolia technique versus subintimal recanalization plus Viabahn stent graft in the management of femoro-popliteal occlusions.标准玻利维亚技术与内膜下再通联合 Viabahn 支架移植物治疗股浅动脉闭塞的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.107. Epub 2010 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
TIVS versus Non-TIVS management of limb vascular injury in limb salvage: systematic review and meta-analysis.保肢治疗中肢体血管损伤的经皮腔内血管成形术(TIVS)与非TIVS治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 11;410(1):95. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03657-0.
2
Temporary Intravascular Shunting Using a Pruitt-F3 Carotid Shunt for Traumatic Popliteal Artery Injury.使用普鲁伊特-F3颈动脉分流管进行临时性血管内分流治疗创伤性腘动脉损伤
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jul 17;12(7):e5980. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005980. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Efficacy of Orthoplastic Management in the Treatment of Traumatic Popliteal Artery Injury.
矫形支具治疗创伤性腘动脉损伤的疗效
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Mar 25;12(3):e5696. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005696. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Blunt Vascular Trauma in the Lower Extremity at a Major Trauma Centre: Salvage Rate and Complications.大型创伤中心下肢钝性血管损伤:挽救率与并发症
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2023 May-Aug;18(2):87-93. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1588.
5
Traumatic popliteal artery spasm diagnosed using intraoperative angiography: A case report.术中血管造影诊断创伤性腘动脉痉挛:一例报告
Trauma Case Rep. 2023 Jun 5;46:100863. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2023.100863. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
The Efficacy of Salvage Intervention with Emergency Transient External Arterial Bypass for Traumatic Artery Occlusion of Main Extremities.急诊临时性体外动脉旁路挽救性干预治疗四肢主要创伤性动脉闭塞的疗效
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):56-59. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_88_21. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
7
Outcomes of Revascularization and Factors Associated With Major Amputation in Patients With Lower Limb Arterial Injury: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.下肢动脉损伤患者血管重建的结局及与大截肢相关的因素:一项单中心回顾性分析
Cureus. 2021 Aug 18;13(8):e17290. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17290. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Bilateral popliteal artery injury: Lessons learned.双侧腘动脉损伤:经验教训
Trauma Case Rep. 2019 Jul 29;23:100230. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100230. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Evaluation, Surgical Management and Outcome of Traumatic Extremity Vascular Injuries: A 5-year Level-1 Trauma Centres Experience.创伤性肢体血管损伤的评估、手术治疗及结果:一家一级创伤中心的5年经验
Ann Vasc Dis. 2018 Sep 25;11(3):312-317. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.18-00068.
10
Vascular Shunts in Civilian Trauma.平民创伤中的血管分流术
Front Surg. 2017 Jul 20;4:39. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00039. eCollection 2017.