Hur Chin, Simon Lee S, Gazelle G Scott
Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Cancer. 2004 Jul 1;101(1):189-97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20329.
Aspirin therapy is accepted widely for secondary prevention in patients with documented cardiovascular disease, but there is a growing trend among healthy individuals to use aspirin as primary chemoprevention for both cardiovascular and oncologic diseases. Accruing evidence suggests that cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors (coxibs) may be effective for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) chemoprevention but would not provide the primary cardiac benefit of aspirin.
A computer-based Markov model simulated hypothetical cohorts of healthy men age 50 years who took either 325 mg of enteric-coated aspirin daily or celecoxib at a dose of 400 mg twice a day. Patients in both cohorts could develop drug-related complications that would lead to its discontinuation. The aspirin group also was modeled to have a decreased rate of coronary ischemic events; however, decreased CRC mortality was not modeled in either group based on the assumption that the two treatments were effective equally in this regard. Data sources included published literature and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Endpoints used to compare the two strategies included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), mortality and complication rates, and cost. The analysis was from a societal perspective with a time horizon of 10 years from age 50 years. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed.
Aspirin therapy resulted in 0.03 more QALYs and cost $23,000 less than coxib therapy over a 10-year period. Compared with the aspirin group, the coxib group had 3.877% more complications and 0.17% more deaths. Alternatively stated, coxib therapy resulted in 1 patient complication or death for every 26 or 588 patients treated with coxibs, respectively.
Assuming equal efficacy in CRC prevention over a 10-year period, aspirin was both more effective and less costly than coxib therapy when used for primary chemoprevention of CRC.
阿司匹林疗法在已确诊心血管疾病的患者二级预防中被广泛接受,但健康个体中使用阿司匹林作为心血管疾病和肿瘤疾病一级化学预防的趋势正在增加。越来越多的证据表明,环氧化酶-2选择性抑制剂(coxibs)可能对结直肠癌(CRC)化学预防有效,但不能提供阿司匹林的主要心脏益处。
基于计算机的马尔可夫模型模拟了50岁健康男性的假设队列,他们每天服用325毫克肠溶阿司匹林或每天两次服用400毫克塞来昔布。两个队列中的患者都可能出现与药物相关的并发症,从而导致停药。阿司匹林组还被模拟为冠状动脉缺血事件发生率降低;然而,基于两种治疗在这方面效果相同的假设,两组均未模拟CRC死亡率降低情况。数据来源包括已发表的文献和医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心。用于比较两种策略的终点包括质量调整生命年(QALYs)、死亡率和并发症发生率以及成本。分析从社会角度进行,时间跨度为从50岁起的10年。进行了广泛的敏感性分析。
在10年期间,阿司匹林疗法比coxib疗法多产生0.03个QALYs,成本少23,000美元。与阿司匹林组相比,coxib组并发症多3.877%,死亡多0.17%。换句话说,coxib疗法分别导致每26例或588例接受coxib治疗的患者中出现1例并发症或死亡。
假设在10年期间CRC预防效果相同,阿司匹林用于CRC一级化学预防时比coxib疗法更有效且成本更低。