Suppr超能文献

阿司匹林对结直肠癌高危患者的化学预防:一项成本效益分析。

Aspirin chemoprevention in patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

DuPont A W, Arguedas M R, Wilcox C M

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0764, USA.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Aug 1;26(3):431-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03380.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aspirin chemoprevention combined with colonoscopy screening is not cost-effective for the general population. However, the cost-effectiveness of aspirin in individuals with prior adenoma resection has not been evaluated.

AIM

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of aspirin chemoprevention alone and in combination with colonoscopy surveillance in patients with prior adenoma resection.

METHODS

A model of the natural history of individuals with a history of endoscopic polypectomy was constructed. Four strategies were compared: (i) no intervention, (ii) routine colonoscopy surveillance, (iii) aspirin chemoprevention alone, and (iv) aspirin therapy combined with colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Compared with no intervention, all other strategies were more costly but were associated with gains in years of life saved. Aspirin chemoprevention alone was associated with a gain of 0.0092 years, whereas routine colonoscopic surveillance and combination strategy were associated with further gains in years of life saved (0.0124 and 0.0138 years, respectively). Compared with no intervention, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of routine colonoscopy surveillance was $78,226 per year of life saved, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of combination aspirin and colonoscopy was $60,942 per year of life saved.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin chemoprevention combined with colonoscopic surveillance in post-polypectomy patients may be considered a cost-effective strategy.

摘要

背景

阿司匹林化学预防联合结肠镜筛查对普通人群而言不具有成本效益。然而,阿司匹林在既往有腺瘤切除史的个体中的成本效益尚未得到评估。

目的

评估阿司匹林化学预防单独应用以及联合结肠镜监测在既往有腺瘤切除史患者中的成本效益。

方法

构建了一个有内镜下息肉切除史个体的自然病史模型。比较了四种策略:(i)不干预,(ii)常规结肠镜监测,(iii)单独使用阿司匹林化学预防,以及(iv)阿司匹林治疗联合结肠镜检查。

结果

与不干预相比,所有其他策略成本更高,但与挽救生命年数的增加相关。单独使用阿司匹林化学预防可使挽救生命年数增加0.0092年,而常规结肠镜监测和联合策略分别可使挽救生命年数进一步增加(分别为0.0124年和0.0138年)。与不干预相比,常规结肠镜监测的增量成本效益比为每挽救一年生命78,226美元,阿司匹林与结肠镜联合检查的增量成本效益比为每挽救一年生命60,942美元。

结论

息肉切除术后患者中,阿司匹林化学预防联合结肠镜监测可被视为一种具有成本效益的策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验