Kunz F Michael, French Michael T, Bazargan-Hejazi Shahrzad
Centerfor Health Economics and Policy Studies, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
J Stud Alcohol. 2004 May;65(3):363-70. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.363.
Alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) has gained widespread acceptance as an effective method for reducing problem drinking in at-risk populations. This study examines the cost and cost-effectiveness of an SBI pilot program delivered in an inner-city hospital emergency department (ED) to a traditionally underserved population.
A total of 1,036 subjects were screened for problem drinking during their visit to an ED. Eligible participants (N = 294) were randomly assigned to either a brief intervention group or a control group. As the result of attrition, a final sample of 194 (90 brief intervention; 104 control) participants remained at follow-up. The intervention consisted of a brief counseling session and a health information packet. The control group received only the packet. Intervention cost data were collected and analyzed using the Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program. Selected outcomes at the 3-month follow-up included the raw Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score, average weekly number of drinks and engaging in heavy drinking in the past month (>6 drinks on one occasion for men, >4 for women). Outcome differences between the intervention and control groups were estimated with both bivariate and multivariate techniques.
The average economic cost of the brief intervention was dollars 632 per subject, of which screening (dollars 497) was the largest component. In all cases, intervention subjects had better 3-month outcomes than control subjects, but the differences were not always statistically significant. Cost-effectiveness ratios were relatively small for all three outcomes, suggesting this type of intervention has the potential to be cost-effective under full implementation.
The preliminary results demonstrate the potential advantage of further research in this area with larger samples and a longer follow-up period.
酒精筛查与简短干预(SBI)作为一种减少高危人群问题饮酒的有效方法已得到广泛认可。本研究考察了在市中心医院急诊科(ED)针对传统上未得到充分服务的人群实施的SBI试点项目的成本及成本效益。
共有1036名受试者在就诊急诊科期间接受了问题饮酒筛查。符合条件的参与者(N = 294)被随机分配到简短干预组或对照组。由于失访,最终有194名参与者(90名简短干预组;104名对照组)进入随访。干预包括一次简短的咨询会话和一份健康信息包。对照组仅收到该信息包。使用药物滥用治疗成本分析程序收集并分析干预成本数据。3个月随访时的选定结果包括酒精使用障碍识别测试原始分数、过去一个月平均每周饮酒量以及重度饮酒情况(男性一次饮酒>6杯,女性>4杯)。使用双变量和多变量技术估计干预组与对照组之间的结果差异。
简短干预的平均经济成本为每名受试者632美元,其中筛查(497美元)是最大组成部分。在所有情况下,干预组受试者的3个月结果均优于对照组,但差异并非总是具有统计学意义。所有三项结果的成本效益比相对较小,表明这种干预类型在全面实施时有潜在的成本效益。
初步结果表明,在该领域进行更大样本量和更长随访期的进一步研究具有潜在优势。