Babul Najib, Noveck Robert, Chipman Howard, Roth Sanford H, Gana Theophilus, Albert Kenneth
TheraQuest, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania 19422, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Jul;28(1):59-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.11.006.
The efficacy and safety of a once-daily extended-release formulation of tramadol hydrochloride (tramadol ER) was evaluated in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain of osteoarthritis (OA). This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week study. Eligible patients with radiographically confirmed OA of the knee meeting the American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria, defined by knee pain and presence of osteophytes, plus at least age >50 years, morning stiffness <30 minutes in duration, and/or crepitus, entered a 2-7 day washout period during which all analgesics were discontinued. When pain at the index knee joint reached > or =40 mm (0-100 mm VAS), patients were randomized to tramadol ER or placebo. Tramadol ER was initiated at 100 mg QD and increased to 200 mg QD by the end of 1 week of treatment. After the first week, further increases to tramadol ER 300 mg or 400 mg QD were allowed. Outcome measures included Arthritis Pain Intensity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Scale (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, Physical Function VAS subscales, Patient and Physician Global Assessment of Therapy, Sleep, dropouts due to insufficient therapeutic effect, and adverse events. Two hundred forty-six patients were randomized (tramadol ER 124, placebo 122). There were no baseline differences between the two treatments. The mean age was 61 years, mean duration of OA 12.9 years, and the mean tramadol ER dose was 276 mg QD. All efficacy outcome measures favored tramadol ER over placebo. On the primary outcome variable of average change from baseline in Arthritis Pain Intensity VAS over 12 weeks, tramadol ER was superior to placebo (least squares mean change from baseline: 30.4 mm vs. 17.7 mm, P < 0.001). Significant differences from placebo were evident at week 1, the first post-treatment visit. Similarly, outcomes on the WOMAC Pain, Stiffness and Physical Function subscales, the WOMAC Composite Scale, dropouts due to insufficient therapeutic effect, Patient and Physician Global Assessment of Therapy, and Sleep were all significantly better with tramadol ER than placebo (P < 0.001 to < 0.05). Treatment with tramadol ER results in statistically significant and clinically important and sustained improvements in pain, stiffness, physical function, global status, and sleep in patients with chronic pain. A once-a-day formulation of tramadol has the potential to provide patients increased control over the management of their pain, fewer interruptions in sleep and improved compliance.
对盐酸曲马多缓释制剂(曲马多缓释片)每日一次给药方案治疗中度至重度骨关节炎(OA)慢性疼痛患者的疗效和安全性进行了评估。这是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、为期12周的研究。符合条件的患者经影像学证实患有膝关节OA,符合美国风湿病学会诊断标准,即膝关节疼痛且存在骨赘,年龄至少>50岁,晨僵持续时间<30分钟,和/或有摩擦音,进入为期2 - 7天的洗脱期,在此期间停用所有镇痛药。当指数膝关节疼痛达到≥40 mm(0 - 100 mm视觉模拟评分法[VAS])时,患者被随机分为曲马多缓释片组或安慰剂组。曲马多缓释片起始剂量为100 mg每日一次,治疗1周结束时增至200 mg每日一次。第1周后,允许将曲马多缓释片进一步增至300 mg或400 mg每日一次。疗效指标包括关节炎疼痛强度视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛、僵硬、身体功能VAS子量表、患者和医生对治疗的整体评估、睡眠、因治疗效果不佳导致的退出率以及不良事件。246例患者被随机分组(曲马多缓释片组124例,安慰剂组122例)。两种治疗方法在基线时无差异。平均年龄为61岁,OA平均病程为12.9年,曲马多缓释片平均剂量为276 mg每日一次。所有疗效指标显示曲马多缓释片优于安慰剂。在12周内关节炎疼痛强度VAS自基线的平均变化这一主要结局变量上,曲马多缓释片优于安慰剂(自基线的最小二乘均值变化:30.4 mm对17.7 mm,P < 0.001)。在治疗后首次访视的第1周,与安慰剂的显著差异就已显现。同样,在WOMAC疼痛、僵硬和身体功能子量表、WOMAC综合量表、因治疗效果不佳导致的退出率、患者和医生对治疗的整体评估以及睡眠方面,曲马多缓释片的结局均显著优于安慰剂(P < 0.001至< 0.05)。曲马多缓释片治疗可使慢性疼痛患者在疼痛、僵硬、身体功能、整体状况和睡眠方面取得具有统计学意义、临床重要性且持续的改善。曲马多每日一次给药方案有可能让患者对疼痛管理有更强的掌控力,减少睡眠中断并提高依从性。