Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):e068182. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068182.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the comparative benefits and harms of opioids and cannabis for medical use for chronic non-cancer pain.
Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, Cannabis-Med, Epistemonikos and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) from inception to March 2021.
Randomised trials comparing any type of cannabis for medical use or opioids, against each other or placebo, with patient follow-up ≥4 weeks.
Paired reviewers independently extracted data. We used Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses to summarise the evidence and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach to evaluate the certainty of evidence and communicate our findings.
Ninety trials involving 22 028 patients were eligible for review, among which the length of follow-up ranged from 28 to 180 days. Moderate certainty evidence showed that opioids provide small improvements in pain, physical functioning and sleep quality versus placebo; low to moderate certainty evidence supported similar effects for cannabis versus placebo. Neither was more effective than placebo for role, social or emotional functioning (all high to moderate certainty evidence). Moderate certainty evidence showed there is probably little to no difference between cannabis for medical use and opioids for physical functioning (weighted mean difference (WMD) 0.47 on the 100-point 36-item Short Form Survey physical component summary score, 95% credible interval (CrI) -1.97 to 2.99), and cannabis resulted in fewer discontinuations due to adverse events versus opioids (OR 0.55, 95% CrI 0.36 to 0.83). Low certainty evidence suggested little to no difference between cannabis and opioids for pain relief (WMD 0.23 cm on a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 95% CrI -0.06 to 0.53) or sleep quality (WMD 0.49 mm on a 100 mm VAS, 95% CrI -4.72 to 5.59).
Cannabis for medical use may be similarly effective and result in fewer discontinuations than opioids for chronic non-cancer pain.
CRD42020185184.
本研究旨在评估医用阿片类药物和大麻治疗慢性非癌性疼痛的相对益处和危害。
系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
从建库至 2021 年 3 月,我们检索了 EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL、AMED、PsycINFO、PubMed、Web of Science、Cannabis-Med、Epistemonikos 和 Cochrane 图书馆(CENTRAL)。
比较任何类型的医用大麻或阿片类药物与安慰剂、彼此之间的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验,随访时间≥4 周。
配对审查员独立提取数据。我们采用贝叶斯随机效应网络荟萃分析来总结证据,并使用推荐、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法来评估证据的确定性,并传达我们的发现。
90 项试验共纳入 22028 名患者,纳入研究的随访时间范围为 28 至 180 天。中等确定性证据表明,与安慰剂相比,阿片类药物能略微改善疼痛、身体功能和睡眠质量;低至中等确定性证据支持大麻与安慰剂相比有类似的效果。对于角色功能、社会功能或情绪功能,两者均不比安慰剂更有效(所有均为高到中等确定性证据)。中等确定性证据表明,医用大麻与阿片类药物在身体功能方面可能没有差异(36 项简明健康状况量表物理成分综合得分 100 分,加权均数差值 0.47,95%可信区间 1.97 至 2.99),并且医用大麻导致的停药率低于阿片类药物(比值比 0.55,95%可信区间 0.36 至 0.83)。低确定性证据表明,在疼痛缓解(10cm 视觉模拟量表 0.23cm,95%可信区间 -0.06 至 0.53)或睡眠质量(100mm 视觉模拟量表 0.49mm,95%可信区间 -4.72 至 5.59)方面,大麻与阿片类药物之间可能没有差异。
医用大麻治疗慢性非癌性疼痛的疗效可能与阿片类药物相似,且停药率可能低于阿片类药物。
CRD42020185184。