Rustad P, Hyltoft Petersen P
Fürst Medical Laboratory, Søren Bulls Vei 25, NO-1051 Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2004;64(4):399-406. doi: 10.1080/00365510410006315.
In the Nordic Reference Interval Project (NORIP), reference intervals were established for 25 common clinical biochemical quantities. In the project, samples from more than 3000 reference individuals collected in the 102 participating laboratories from all five Nordic countries were analysed locally. In order to maintain a high level of analytical quality and to document this quality, a common calibrator/reference preparation (CAL) and a number of control samples were analysed together with the reference samples. All these materials were serum pools of unprocessed serum from many donors in order to obtain commutable materials. The CAL was used to harmonize the many different analytical procedures and calibrations by simple recalibration by the factor T/M where T is the target value based on reference methods and M is the mean of 10 replicate measurements of CAL in each laboratory. The analytical quality specifications (analytical goals) were based on specifications created directly for the purpose of sharing common reference intervals and only the bias criteria were used because bias is the dominating problem in transfer of reference intervals. These specifications were different for the evaluation of reference values to create common reference intervals and for the laboratories to use these common reference intervals (when established). An interesting outcome was that it was only for the biologically well-regulated quantities serum-sodium and serum-calcium that the selection of the best laboratories gave considerably narrower reference intervals.
在北欧参考区间项目(NORIP)中,为25种常见临床生化指标建立了参考区间。在该项目中,来自北欧五国102个参与实验室收集的3000多名参考个体的样本在当地进行了分析。为了保持较高的分析质量并记录该质量,将一种通用校准物/参考制剂(CAL)和一些对照样本与参考样本一起进行分析。所有这些材料均为来自许多捐赠者的未处理血清的混合血清,以获得具有互换性的材料。CAL用于通过简单地用因子T/M重新校准来协调许多不同的分析程序和校准,其中T是基于参考方法的目标值,M是每个实验室对CAL进行10次重复测量的平均值。分析质量规范(分析目标)基于直接为共享通用参考区间而制定的规范,并且仅使用偏差标准,因为偏差是参考区间转移中的主要问题。这些规范对于评估参考值以创建通用参考区间以及实验室使用这些通用参考区间(建立后)是不同的。一个有趣的结果是,只有对于生物调节良好的指标血清钠和血清钙,选择最佳实验室才能得到明显更窄的参考区间。