Lin Vivian
School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne.
Soz Praventivmed. 2004;49(3):179-84. doi: 10.1007/s00038-004-3083-1.
The rise of evidence-based medicine has given impetus to calls for more research evidence to be incorporated into health policy. The difficulty in effecting this research transfer has often been attributed to the different "worlds" of researchers and policy-makers. There are other contradictions, however, that must be addressed in attempting to bridge public health research and health promotion policy. These include such issues as: what forms of evidence are required, what types of research are usually funded, the limited scope and duration of health promotion programs, how health policies are formulated, contemporary public sector management reforms, and so on. These contradictions need to be recognized and managed if closer links are to be formed between public health research and health promotion policy.
循证医学的兴起推动了将更多研究证据纳入卫生政策的呼声。实现这种研究转化的困难往往归因于研究人员和政策制定者所处的不同“世界”。然而，在试图弥合公共卫生研究与健康促进政策之间的差距时，还必须解决其他矛盾。这些问题包括：需要何种形式的证据、通常资助何种类型的研究、健康促进项目的范围和持续时间有限、卫生政策如何制定、当代公共部门管理改革等等。如果要在公共卫生研究与健康促进政策之间建立更紧密的联系，就需要认识并处理这些矛盾。
