Suppr超能文献

用于测量有机土壤改良剂净氮矿化率的原位方法比较。

A comparison of in situ methods for measuring net nitrogen mineralization rates of organic soil amendments.

作者信息

Hanselman Travis A, Graetz Donald A, Obreza Thomas A

机构信息

Soil and Water Science Department, 106 Newell Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0510, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2004 May-Jun;33(3):1098-105. doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.1098.

Abstract

In situ incubation methods may help provide site-specific estimates of N mineralization from land-applied wastes. However, there are concerns about the reliability of the data generated by the various methods due to containment artifacts. We amended a sandy soil with either poultry manure, biosolids, or yard-waste compost and incubated the mixtures using four in situ methods (buried bags, covered cylinders, standard resin traps, and "new" soil-resin traps) and a conventional laboratory technique in plastic bags. Each incubation device was destructively sampled at 45-d intervals for 180 d and net N mineralization was determined by measuring the amount of inorganic N that accumulated in the soil or soil plus resin traps. Containment effects were evaluated by comparing water content of the containerized soil to a field-reference soil column. In situ incubation methods provided reasonable estimates of short-term (< 45 d) N mineralization, but long-term (> 45 d) mineralization data were not accurate due to a variety of problems specific to each technique. Buried bags and covered cylinders did not retain mineralized N due to water movement into and out of the containers. Neither resin method captured all of the mineralized N that leached through the soil columns, but the new soil-resin trap method tracked field soil water content better than all other in situ methods evaluated. With further refinement and validation, the new soil-resin trap method may be a useful in situ incubation technique for measuring net N mineralization rates of organic soil amendments.

摘要

原位培养方法可能有助于提供关于土地施用废弃物氮矿化的特定地点估计值。然而,由于容器效应,人们对各种方法所产生数据的可靠性存在担忧。我们用家禽粪便、生物固体或庭院废物堆肥改良了一种沙质土壤,并使用四种原位方法(掩埋袋、覆盖圆筒、标准树脂阱和“新型”土壤-树脂阱)以及塑料袋中的传统实验室技术对混合物进行培养。每个培养装置在180天内每隔45天进行破坏性采样,通过测量土壤或土壤加树脂阱中积累的无机氮量来确定净氮矿化量。通过将容器化土壤的含水量与田间参考土柱的含水量进行比较来评估容器效应。原位培养方法对短期(<45天)氮矿化提供了合理估计,但由于每种技术特有的各种问题,长期(>45天)矿化数据并不准确。由于水进出容器,掩埋袋和覆盖圆筒无法保留矿化氮。两种树脂方法都没有捕获所有通过土柱淋溶的矿化氮,但新型土壤-树脂阱方法比评估的所有其他原位方法更好地跟踪了田间土壤含水量。经过进一步改进和验证,新型土壤-树脂阱方法可能是一种用于测量有机土壤改良剂净氮矿化率的有用原位培养技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验